vim-easycomplete VS vim-lsc

vim-easycomplete

There are many excellent vim auto-completion plugins such as nvim-cmp, vim-lsp, YouCompleteMe and coc.nvim etc. I used coc.nvim for a long time. It’s experience is good. But there are a few things I don’t like. These plugins tend to have too much dependencies and do not have minimal configuration. For example, I don't want to install Node when programming c++ or golang. In my opinion vim is more lightweight than vscode so I don’t need the fully integrated features of it. Besides other completion plugins neither have good experiences enough nor compatible with vim and nvim at the same time. Therefor I created vim-easycomplete according to my personal habits.

I tried something else that was really slow, jedi worked just fine so I've stuck with that. Running vim-lsc as the client.

There are other alternatives for the LSP ecosystem in vim like vim-lsp which is (I think) just an LSP with autocompletion and warnings (aka, doesn't have the additional features that YCM or ALE have). Or, the more out-of-the-box experience (and also an option not liked by everyone because it can be considered bloated) coc.nvim.

This might be of help https://github.com/natebosch/vim-lsc/issues/352, but I wouldn't recommend installing typescript-language-server using "sudo yarn/npm". Instead I would use system's package manager if the package is available.

Hi Recently, I found https://github.com/natebosch/vim-lsc, it is also there in the Microsoft's LSP page as well. I moved away from CoC because I found it to be 1. Too slow to use on my machine (8 GB, 4 CPU) 2. It is too big as well, has it's own command line and plugins inside vim and it appeared to be a behemoth for just the LSP use case

But actually Mathias(mfussenegger) added the debounce logic, and Nate Bosch (the author of vim-lsc) author gave the commentary/design of the incremental sync logic.

vim-lsc or vim-lamp