vim-copy-as-rtf
pandoc
vim-copy-as-rtf | pandoc | |
---|---|---|
2 | 420 | |
124 | 32,449 | |
- | - | |
10.0 | 9.8 | |
over 2 years ago | 6 days ago | |
Vim Script | Haskell | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v2.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vim-copy-as-rtf
- Which vim plugins do not have a lua equivalent yet?
-
I can easily copy codes with syntax highlighting in VScode. Can I do the same with Neovim?
There is silicon.nvim that uses the cli tool silicon to export the code as an image (I think there is also an alternative that uses carbon). There is also vim-copy-as-rtf that works only on OSx and Code2RTF.vim that works only on Windows (there was a fork of vim-copy-as-rtf for Linux, but I can't find it). Finally, there is this discussion about alternatives, being one of them to use pandoc and :TOHtml to export the text as RTF
pandoc
-
Beautifying Org Mode in Emacs (2018)
My main authoring tool is then Emacs Markdown Mode (https://jblevins.org/projects/markdown-mode/). For data entry, it comes with some bells and whistles similar to org-mode, like C-c C-l for inserting links etc.
I seldom export my notes for external usage, but if it is the case, I use lowdown (https://kristaps.bsd.lv/lowdown/) which also comes with some nice output targets (among the more unusual are Groff and Terminal). Of cource pandoc (https://pandoc.org/) does a very good job here, too.
-
Show HN: I made a tool to clean and convert any webpage to Markdown
This is one of those things that the ever-amazing pandoc (https://pandoc.org/) does very well, on top of supporting virtually every other document format.
-
LaTeX makes me so angry at word
Folks feel the same way about Markdown versus LaTeX: why use something significantly more complicated where a looser, human-readable grammar works better?
For any other situations, I use https://pandoc.org/, or, generate a Word doc scriptomatically.
-
📓 Versionner et builder l'eBook de son Entretien Annuel d'Evaluation sur Git(Hub)
pandoc toolchain pour builder une version confortable/imprimable en phase de travail (ePub, pdf, docx, html)
-
Launch HN: Onedoc (YC W24) – A better way to create PDFs
Congrats on the launch, I guess, but there are so many free options that I can't think of a situation where paying $0.25 per document would be justified...? Just to name a few:
Back in the days, I used to use XSL-FO [0] and it was okay. It was not very precise but it rarely if ever broke, and was perfectly integrated with an XML/XSLT solution. Yeah, this was a long time ago.
Last month I used html-to-pdfmake [1] and it's also not very precise and more fragile, but very efficient and fast.
Yet another approach would be to pro grammatically generate .rtf files (for example) and use Pandoc [2] to produce PDFs (I have not tried this in production but don't see why it wouldn't work).
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XSL_Formatting_Objects
[1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-to-pdfmake
[2] https://pandoc.org/
-
Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow.
[1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/
[2]: https://pandoc.org/
-
Show HN: CLI for generating beautiful PDF for offline reading
Have you compared it with a conversion by pandoc (https://pandoc.org/)?
-
Pandoc
I have used it to kickstart a blogging project that I wish to come back to soon. The Lua inter-op for custom readers, writers and filters is great but I wish there was more editor integration and even perhaps an official IDE/editor with built-in debugging features (probably something already do-able with Emacs but I haven't checked). The only blocker for my project is no support for "ChunkedDoc" for Lua filters [1] which forces me to write more code and a complicated Makefile.
[1]: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/9061
- I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
- What Happened to Pandoc-Discuss?
What are some alternatives?
committia.vim - A Vim plugin for more pleasant editing on commit messages
pandoc-highlighting-extensions - Extensions to Pandoc syntax highlighting
vimtex - VimTeX: A modern Vim and neovim filetype plugin for LaTeX files.
obsidian-html - :file_cabinet: A simple tool to convert an Obsidian vault into a static directory of HTML files.
vim-unimpaired - unimpaired.vim: Pairs of handy bracket mappings
obsidian-export - Rust library and CLI to export an Obsidian vault to regular Markdown
vim-fetch - Make Vim handle line and column numbers in file names with a minimum of fuss
Obsidian-MD-To-PDF - A command line python script to convert Obsidian md files to a pdf
vim-colorscheme-switcher - Makes it easy to quickly switch between color schemes in Vim
kramdown - kramdown is a fast, pure Ruby Markdown superset converter, using a strict syntax definition and supporting several common extensions.
iron.nvim - Interactive Repl Over Neovim
wavedrom - :ocean: Digital timing diagram rendering engine