vale
LunarVim
Our great sponsors
vale | LunarVim | |
---|---|---|
46 | 272 | |
4,178 | 17,463 | |
3.1% | 2.0% | |
9.3 | 7.6 | |
4 days ago | 12 days ago | |
Go | Lua | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vale
- Software Technical Writing: A Guidebook [pdf]
- Grammarly editor writing service are malfunctioning
- Vale.sh – A Linter for Prose
- Ask HN: Best tool to proof-read technical documentation?
- Val, a high-level systems programming language
-
Common Bugs in Writing
Vale is an OSS tool that you can use as a "prose linter" with many of these rules. You can also write your own rules. Together with a spellchecker its a good replacement for proprietary tools like grammarly.
- https://github.com/errata-ai/vale
-
Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
> Write in US English with US grammar. (Tested in British.yml.)
heh, that was funny but it turns out the file is a list of British words checked using Vale, which I just learned existed: https://github.com/errata-ai/vale#readme (MIT)
Also, another TIL is that the "e" version of gray is British https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/doc/.vale... I had previously erroneously assumed they were just one of those quirks of English (which, I guess is still true but it is less random than I thought)
-
Tools that enforce/promote corporate standards?
Off the top of my head, Vale and Acrolinx.
-
Over 60% of Writers Already Use AI in Their Writing Workflow
I have recently thought of feeding the suggestions from Vale (https://vale.sh/) into an LLM along with your writing. Currently I just simply ask an LLM to take what I wrote and put it into a more "active voice". I then manually edit my writing to make it more "active" if I choose -- I do not just publish LLM generated content unaltered.
Note: I did not ask an LLM for this comment.
-
What terminal apps are you using?
vale to spell check and enforce writing style on my articles
LunarVim
-
Every Neovim, Every Config, All At Once
LunarVim
- LunarVIM: An IDE Layer for Neovim
-
Tools to achieve a 10x developer workflow on Windows
I would suggest to start getting into vim by first trying out popular vim keybinding plugins available on your favorite code editor and get used to those first. Then, if you want to dive deeper into the power of Neovim, try out popular configs like LazyVim, LunarVim, NvChad... Taking Neovim from a mere text editor to a full-featured IDE with features like intellisense, debugging, testing, etc... on your own takes quite a lot of work and configuration.
-
Helix 23.10 Highlights
I used Helix for a while due to its support for LSP out-of-the-box, which my Vim config at the time couldn't live up to. I switched back to NeoVim after finding LunarVim[1] which had everything I was trying to get setup in my own config.
[1] https://www.lunarvim.org/
- How to Transform Vim to a Complete IDE?
-
Mastering Emacs
I'll admit I didn't look into it, but Helix sounds like something like LunarVim (https://www.lunarvim.org/)
Personally I much prefer that the editor NOT ship with something like that by default, especially when it's so easy to set up. I have several different vim config I use, including a pretty bare-bones one for headless systems, and I much prefer the ability to customize something very specifically.
Build tools that can compose together, rather than a single do-it-all tool. That is the power of the low level editors vs IDE's.
- No inline errors in Python unless I add and delete a line
-
LazyVim
I can't comment on any implementation details, but at least with LunarVim (which I use for daily coding), a slowdown when interacting with LSP is very noticeable. Some others have attested to this on a GitHub issue.
I'm not doubting your experiences with the lack of a slowdown, but there is truth that others do experience it. That might be more of a problem with LunarVim itself rather than Vim, but how likely am I (as someone who would like to avoid what he calls "config hell") or other newcomers to avoid whatever pitfalls there are, if a distribution designed for ease of use by people who know better fall into them?
https://github.com/LunarVim/LunarVim/discussions/3359
- Should Neovim now release a standard official configuration so that people who want an editor that just works out of the box get onboarded easily ?
-
neovim config
Anyways, although i have not used them, LazyVim and LunarVim comes highly recommended. You can try these and see what suits you .
What are some alternatives?
proselint - A linter for prose.
AstroNvim - AstroNvim is an aesthetic and feature-rich neovim config that is extensible and easy to use with a great set of plugins
lsp-grammarly - lsp-mode ❤️ grammarly
SpaceVim - A community-driven modular vim/neovim distribution - The ultimate vimrc
nvim-lspconfig - Quickstart configs for Nvim LSP
NvChad - An attempt to make neovim cli as functional as an IDE while being very beautiful , blazing fast. [Moved to: https://github.com/NvChad/NvChad]
write-good - Naive linter for English prose
NvChad - Blazing fast Neovim config providing solid defaults and a beautiful UI, enhancing your neovim experience.
markdownlint - Repository for the markdownlint-mdl-action Github Action
Neovim-from-scratch - 📚 A Neovim config designed from scratch to be understandable
remark-lint - plugins to check (lint) markdown code style
LazyVim - Neovim config for the lazy