µTest VS cf020031308

Compare µTest vs cf020031308 and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
µTest cf020031308
2 1
479 0
-0.4% -
4.8 0.0
3 days ago about 2 years ago
Scala
- -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

µTest

Posts with mentions or reviews of µTest. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-11.
  • From First Principles: Why Scala?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Feb 2021
    Let's clarify some points for folks not so familiar with Scala.

    > * Scala minor version are binary incompatible, so maintaining Scala projects is a big pain. Upgrading Spark from Scala 2.11 to Scala 2.12 was a massive undertaking for example.

    Scala just chose a strange naming scheme. Other languages would have just increased their major version instead. The scala minor version is increased every few years and not every month or so.

    > * Scala has tons of language features and lets people do crazy things in the code.

    Actually, that's not true. Or rather: compared to what language?

    Scala has surprisingly few language features, but the ones it has are very flexible and powerful. Take Kotlin for example. It has method extensions as a dedicated feature. Scala just has implicits which can be used for method extension.

    > * Scalatest is stil used by most projects and is annoying to use, as described here: https://github.com/lihaoyi/utest#why-utest. The overuse of DSLs in Scala is really annoying.

    I agree with the overuse of DSLs. Luckily that got much better, but older libraries like scalatest still suffer from that.

    > * Li's libs (os-lib, upickle, utest) have clean public interfaces, but most Scala ecosystem libs are hard to use, see the JSON alternatives for examples

    I think that just comes from using the library in a non-idiomatic way. In most applications, you will need to use the whole json anyways, and then you use (or can use) circe like that:

        {

cf020031308

Posts with mentions or reviews of cf020031308. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-11.
  • From First Principles: Why Scala?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Feb 2021
    After a number of years with Python, I started a position working in Scala about 6 months ago. I really wanted to learn something new, and become acquainted with functional programming concepts.

    I agree with most of the above. A couple of additional thoughts:

    sbt -- I still have a lot of coming up to speed to do here, but the manual is like 500 pages and it's somewhat overwhelming. There are tons of little oddities, like why can't I run `sbt --version` and instead have to do `sbt sbtVersion`?

    The functional side is fascinating -- I'm still studying the cats library. I can almost describe a Monad! It's a pretty big mountain, though, and there are times where I have doubts whether the benefits will be worth it. Would love to hear some re-assurance! ;)

    The ecosystem for microservices seems pretty closely tied to akka & lagom. These are quite complex in their own right and we've been having trouble with the latter in particular. Curious to learn about alternatives. ZIO?

    Re: DSLs. Also not a huge fan of DSLs. One refreshing thing about python is that often configuration can just be in Python itself (as in Django, for example). See also:

    [1] https://erikbern.com/2018/08/30/i-dont-want-to-learn-your-ga...

    [2] https://github.com/cf020031308/cf020031308.github.io/blob/ma...

    [3] https://twitter.com/antonycourtney/status/589238574429515777

What are some alternatives?

When comparing µTest and cf020031308 you can also consider the following projects:

ScalaMock - Native Scala mocking framework

ScalikeJDBC - A tidy SQL-based DB access library for Scala developers. This library naturally wraps JDBC APIs and provides you easy-to-use APIs.

Diffy

kotlin-spark-api - This projects gives Kotlin bindings and several extensions for Apache Spark. We are looking to have this as a part of Apache Spark 3.x

scalaprops - property based testing library for Scala

dotty - The Scala 3 compiler, also known as Dotty.

Scala Test-State - Scala Test-State.

PyCall.jl - Package to call Python functions from the Julia language

Gatling - Modern Load Testing as Code

Quill - Compile-time Language Integrated Queries for Scala

Scalive - Connect a Scala REPL to running JVM processes without any prior setup

Slick - Slick (Scala Language Integrated Connection Kit) is a modern database query and access library for Scala