urweb
purescript
urweb | purescript | |
---|---|---|
6 | 52 | |
797 | 8,464 | |
0.3% | 0.4% | |
4.7 | 6.5 | |
about 2 months ago | 19 days ago | |
Standard ML | Haskell | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
urweb
- My views on NeoHaskell
- Ask HN: Uncommon Web Languages?
-
What modern and mature language does both general purpose and data persistence ?
Examples of these are Links and Ur/web.
-
A list of new budding programming languages and their interesting features?
Ur-Web
-
Async/await inference in Firefly
I’ve heard of Links and Ur-web.
-
Lightweight Modular Staging and Embedded Compilers: Abstraction without Regret for High-Level High-Performance Programming
There is definitely prior art for this in Links and Ur-Web, but I'm not as tied to pure functional or dependently-typed languages. Though, we'll see where it goes. Coming up with the right "interface" for that has been a challenge, to say the least, so that's why I keep reading about what's out there.
purescript
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
I will die on this hill (curve)
*cough* I mean Purescript.
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
What are some alternatives?
Kind - A next-gen functional language [Moved to: https://github.com/Kindelia/Kind2]
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
awesome-programming-languages - The list of an awesome programming languages that you might be interested in
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
sligh - A language for certifying specification
elm-reactor
FStar - A Proof-oriented Programming Language
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
coffeescript - Unfancy JavaScript
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
gleam - ⭐️ A friendly language for building type-safe, scalable systems!
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types