unocss | Next.js | |
---|---|---|
56 | 2,047 | |
15,486 | 120,804 | |
1.5% | 1.0% | |
9.7 | 10.0 | |
about 23 hours ago | 5 days ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
unocss
-
Tailwind CSS v4.0.0 Alpha
I wish tailwind would support attributify like https://github.com/unocss/unocss, which is much more readable for complex layouts:
link
- UnoCSS — an Instant On-Demand Atomic CSS Engine
-
Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
I feel the same about people praising Tailwind.
Tailwind (and similar, I tend to use https://unocss.dev/) is not good for your frontend architecture BUT they allow you to be so fast, that it negates the benefits.
For a job well done, I'd follow the principles of https://maintainablecss.com/
-
What do you think we can do better to improve Vue position in the frontend space as a dominant UI framework?
I think UnoCss is may be better than Tailwind already and has a good Vue integration https://unocss.dev/
-
~~New~~ Old way to write CSS
The most popular tools that implement this approach are: Tailwind, WindiCSS, UnoCSS.
-
Which is best for DX and efficiency, TailwindCSS, UnoCSS, PandaCSS, or the new MasterCSS
- UnoCSS: https://unocss.dev/
-
A design system for the federal government
haha, fair point. Still, I'm on the fence about how utility components are namespaced in USWDS. Perhaps giving users the flexibility to define the namespace might work better? One thing that bugs me is the absence of class-sorting like we have in TailwindCSS. Plus, there are some gaps I've noticed in USWDS. The naming, especially when comparing "padding-x-2" and "p-x-2", can be really annoying when switching around, maybe that could also be an option for the developer or project. Similar to the ideas antfu has on uno.css https://unocss.dev/ ♥
-
Modern CSS Framework or Library for Static Websites?
UnoCSS is a popular option
-
Vrite Editor: Open-Source WYSIWYG Markdown Editor
UnoCSS — for styling with Tailwind-like atomic CSS;
-
Why I Switched From Neovim to VSCode
Some exceptional libraries and frameworks only support VSCode, which you could argue is a bad thing, but it makes sense, VSCode is the most popular code editor after all. For example UnoCSS only has a VSCode extension, and it's my favourite way to write CSS. Astro has a LSP but I've found that the experience in VSCode is much better than in Neovim.
Next.js
-
Deploying organization repo to Vercel with a hobby plan
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27666 One of them said 'renaming folder to uppercase' might cause trouble. git might not recognize case-sensetive changes by default.
-
How to Build Your Own ChatGPT Clone Using React & AWS Bedrock
Next.js has long cemented itself as one of the front runners in the web framework world for JavaScript/TypeScript projects so we’re going to be using that. More specifically we’re going to be using V14 of Next.js which allows us to use some exciting new features like Server Actions and the App Router.
-
Is purging still the hardest problem in computer science?
Web frameworks like Next.js will usually include this feature, but do check that they set the caching headers correctly!
-
Vite vs Nextjs: Which one is right for you?
Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.
-
A brief history of web development. And why your framework doesn't matter
> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.
Would you like to elaborate on that?
In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.
For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/
Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/
Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main
Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/
React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.
Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.
-
System & Database Design (Day 1) - Creating a SaaS Startup in 30 Days
Next.js: For the website and the admin dashboard
-
Runtime environmental variables in Next.js 14
Until the time of writing, there is no official example of how to enable runtime environmental variables in a Dockerized Next.js app, as utilizing unstable_noStore would only dynamically evaluate variables on the server (node.js runtime). There is also an interesting discussion regarding this topic on GitHub.
-
@matstack/remix-adonisjs VS Next.js - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 24 Apr 2024
next.js is a very popular React framework. remix-adonisjs includes more functionality through the AdonisJS backend ecosystem, and should be easier to self-host and self-manage.
-
Meet Cheryl Murphy: Full-Stack Developer, lifelong learner, and volunteer Project Team Lead at Web Dev Path
Cheryl Murphy is not only a dedicated full-stack web developer skilled in technologies like React, Next.js, and NestJs but also a community-driven professional who recently took on the role of volunteer project team lead at Web Dev Path. With a dual Bachelor's degree in Computing and Chemical Engineering from Monash University, Cheryl’s journey in tech is marked by a passion for building accessible solutions and a commitment to fostering community within tech.
-
Ensuring Type Safety in Next.js Routing
For more information, check out this issue.
What are some alternatives?
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
Express - Fast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for node.
tail-kit - Tail-kit is a free and open source components and templates kit fully coded with Tailwind css 3.0.
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
unplugin-vue-components - 📲 On-demand components auto importing for Vue
MERN - ⛔️ DEPRECATED - Boilerplate for getting started with MERN stack
Quasar Framework - Quasar Framework - Build high-performance VueJS user interfaces in record time
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
pico - Minimal CSS Framework for semantic HTML
fastify - Fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js