unix-history-repo
gnu-units
unix-history-repo | gnu-units | |
---|---|---|
51 | 5 | |
6,434 | 13 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
almost 2 years ago | almost 14 years ago | |
Assembly | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
unix-history-repo
-
F/OSS Comics: 8. The Origins of Unix and the C Language
There is also https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo (Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today)
-
Kernighan and Pike were right: Do one thing, and do it well
FWIW, ls in Research-V6 back in 1975 had 10 options. https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/Researc...
By BSD 3 in 1980 it had 11 options. https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/BSD-3-S...
The thing is, we can see even from the 1970s 'ls' how the Unix model doesn't meet the goal "to chain these simple programs together to create complex behaviors".
There is no option to escape or NUL terminate a filename, making it possible to construct a filename containing a newline which makes the output look like two file entries.
The option for that was added later.
There's also the issue that embedded terminal codes will be interpreted by the terminal.
-
The original source code of the vi text editor, taken from System V
This is what it looked like about 7-8 years earlier: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/BSD-1/e...
- Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today
-
50 Years in Filesystems: 1974
RA92 (1989): 16 ms / 8.3 ms.
Note that the RL02 (and V7) and RA92 mentioned in the article are separated by about a decade.
[1] https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/Researc...
-
Unix: An Oral History
The earliest version I could find [1] is already written in C.
[1] https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/Researc...
-
Linux is not as smooth as windows
Here's a 1997 citation for "top cpu processes." It's not as close to the original 1984 release as I would like, but it's better than Wikipedia. https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/commit/aee34003d7964653c44c31f5bf6bcf136b32c4f3
- GitHub was Founded in 2008 But...
-
GPT based tool that writes the commit message for you
> The “why” goes into the PR and more importantly, engineering documentation and inline comments
This just ensures that the “why” is lost when someone comes looking years later.
From experience, SCM metadata is far more durable than just about any other work product we produce. Five decades later and RCS commit info was still available for the Unix sources, and history could be reconstructed: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo
I’ve used 35-year-old commit messages to help understand a long-standing issue, decades after all other related organization tooling and data had disappeared.
-
What should be included in a history of the Rust language?
P.S. I remember I looked into early versions of C (they survived in Unix historic releases) and that, finally, revealed to me why C does something really stupid and conflates arrays and slices (pointers). Initially C had no arrays! Or, rather, what it called arrays were, actually, pointers. “Normal” arrays were added at some point, but because these weird slices/pointers were already there that caused endless confusion. It wasn't resolved before C became popular and after that it was too late. Go repeated that mistake with slices, of course.
gnu-units
- Kagi Search – Public Beta
- The case of the 500-mile email
-
Whatever Happened to Wolfram Alpha?
you might want to try units(1).
https://www.gnu.org/software/units/units.html
the input language is less flexible than wolframalpha/google, but i quickly got used to it. it's nice to have something local and reliable. you can also define custom units.
i prefer using it in terse mode:
$ units -t 0.03$/hr*1month
-
Rates - currency rates in your terminal
Yes, units must not be used for currencies, it relies on hardcoded conversion rates. The latest version uses prices from FloatRates (2020-11-15) for most currencies and services.packetizer.com/btc for bitcoin. So while units is very very good for units conversion, it's no good for currencies unless you don't need more than a crude rule of thumb.
-
GNU Units
Does the GNU projet makes it repositories available online ?
I'd like to have a look at the code but all I found is an outdated mirror : https://github.com/ryantenney/gnu-units
What are some alternatives?
PySyft - Perform data science on data that remains in someone else's server
rate.sx - :moneybag: curl cryptocurrencies exchange rates
rss-proxy - RSS-proxy allows you to do create an RSS or ATOM feed of almost any website, just by analyzing just the static HTML structure.
Unitful.jl - Physical quantities with arbitrary units
intellij-rainbow-brackets - 🌈Rainbow Brackets for IntelliJ based IDEs/Android Studio/HUAWEI DevEco Studio/Fleet
UnitSystems.jl - Physical unit systems (Metric, English, Natural, etc...)
m1n1 - A bootloader and experimentation playground for Apple Silicon
Ruby Units - A unit handling library for ruby
typos - Source code spell checker
insect - High precision scientific calculator with support for physical units
bubbleos