typeprof VS mocha

Good to see IDE support for TypeProf type hints[1]. I've been doing a lot of work in statically typed languages lately. Ruby has been moving towards static types for a while, but the lack of IDE support has always been the dealbreaker for me to pick up Ruby again.

[1] https://github.com/ruby/typeprof/blob/master/doc/ide.md

rbs collection feature integrates this repository and tools use RBS, such as rbs command, Steep, and TypeProf.

Using something like Vitest, Jest, or Mocha didn't work because:

MochaJS is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on Node.js, making it a popular choice for both backend and frontend testing. It's known for its flexibility and straightforward syntax, allowing for asynchronous testing and the use of any assertion library.

We use Jest Framework for testing. Jest is not a dogma, and, of course, in its place can be any other test runner, such as Mocha or Ava. Let's focus on tests. I'll provide a short example because I don’t want to waste your time. You can find the full version here. It's crucial to read the comments in the code below. Let's go!

JavaScript Popular tools for testing: Mocha, Jasmine, Unit JS, Jest

To execute your tests, you can create test scripts using popular testing frameworks like Mocha, Jasmine, or Jest. These frameworks provide a structured way to organize and run your tests, report results, and handle assertions.

⚗️ Mocha and Chai for testing

Testing frameworks like Jest, Mocha, and Jasmine are crucial for software development, ensuring code reliability and correctness. They offer features like test suites, test cases, assertions, and asynchronous testing support.