typed.js VS Mo.js

Try typed.js.

With the the help of TypedJS and TailwindCSS this is actually really easy.

i've used typed.js on my last project. really easy to implement

The final thing that i want to do is to have a typewriter effect to cyc;e through various 'texts' on the heading, to tell the visitor what things I can do. Now for that I could use css combine with js to have what I need. But there i no need to re-invent the wheel. It won't be a good idea to re-invent wheels for your car right? I'm just going to use typed js. I could actually use the vue implementation but the thing is, it's says nothing about vue3 and also it's quite old.

Link to GitHub

also https://github.com/mattboldt/typed.js/issues/274

to used typed.js you have to navigate to GitHub link of typed.js and copy the CDN file

a)Typed.js

Mo.js is a potent and adaptable JavaScript animation library with a straightforward API and browser support. It's distinguished by its high-performance animations and density-independent effects, ensuring outstanding visual quality on any device. Mo.js provides extensive tools for animation creation, including Player for animation control, Curve Editor, and Timeline Editor for custom easing and editing.

mojs.github.io

Javascript touch events paired with WebGL would be the route I’d go. There are some really great libraries for WebGL (twojs) or working with SVG (mojs) if you want to keep it simple

13. mo.js

d)MoJS

I've looked around and found Mo.js which seems super cool, but it doesn't look like animations can be exported as a video? I want to avoid having to screen record if I can because I feel like the video quality is never as good as had it been directly exported.

Animation. You are creative, and you want your site to grab users' attention at first sight. JavaScript is there for you. With modern frameworks and libraries, such as Three.js,Anime.js,Mo.js any imaginable animation is possible.