twin.examples VS eslint-plugin-prettier

Hey, I'm trying (and failing) to put together a codesandbox. I think it's easier to replicate the steps from here: https://github.com/ben-rogerson/twin.examples/tree/master/next-styled-components

well, this is exactly how it's set up in the twin.macro example repo with next.js, and it is working perfectly fine?

You can pretty much follow all the steps from this tutorial, until this point where it tells you to extend JSX with a jsx-pragma in front of every twin.macro import. The documentation underneath says the following:

Alright, I had my tools in place and it was time to start connecting the dots, so to speak. I kicked off a new TSDX project, installed Styled components, and then went on to try and set up twin.macro. However, I hit a snag there... In the Twin example repo, there was no Styled Components + Storybook example, so I configured what seemed to make sense. Then I went on to add some samples, imported them into a new Story, and tried to run Storybook. It didn't work as expected. Some of the code worked and other components that were using the tw syntax didn't:

the biggest would be as a plugin to compile/transpile other language macros for example twin-macro (styled components using tailwind syntax) https://github.com/ben-rogerson/twin.examples/tree/master/component-library-styled-components/packages/components

You can also add ESLint now (props to @femincan for the suggestion). It comes with recommended settings for these plugins: typescript, prettier, react, react-hooks, jsx-a11y.

I recommend installing and configuring the eslint-plugin-prettier package in your project: https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier

eslint-plugin-prettier

Another approach that you can also take is a sort of "prettier as an ESLint plugin" option, such with eslint-plugin-prettier. The idea is that the developer only needs to run one tool (ESLint), but you add a plugin to ESLint that just calls prettier and converts the prettier error messages to ESLint error messages. I've worked at companies that have used this approach, and it makes setting up your editor/IDE very simple, because you've only got one tool to configure. That said, I personally don't like it because it forces you to use ESLint's "auto fix" functionality, which I find works well for formatting, but IME less well for some of the other lints.

A comprehensive set of formatting (through eslint-plugin-prettier) and linting rules, generated with Clinter. Once again, each package can easily extend the root configuration.

The eslint-config-prettier package disables all ESLint rules that might conflict with Prettier. This lets us use ESLint configurations without letting it get in the way when using Prettier. We can then use the eslint-plugin-prettier package to integrate Prettier rules into ESLint rules. Finally, we must set the Prettier rules in the ESLint configuration file. Add the following configuration to the .eslintrc file in the root directory of the application:

We run prettier through eslint, and run eslint through jest which provides parallelism. eslint also has a cache... So I'm not sure what dprint gets you over that?

https://github.com/jest-community/jest-runner-eslint

https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier

I personally use eslint-plugin-prettier so Prettier formatting issues are shown in my editor and are reported when linting using ESLint.

When installing the Prettier and ESLint extensions for VSCode, formatting and linting will also work within VSCode for any files in the monorepo. Only tweak required to make this work is to configure the Prettier plugin for ESLint (see example .eslintrc.json). Otherwise Prettier and ESLint will get in each other’s way and make for a poor editing experience. To make this work, the following two settings will also need to be configured in a .vscode/settings.json configuration (see settings.json):

NOTICE: The template does not use eslint-plugin-prettier and prettier-eslint. So I recommend that running commands individually. e.g. prettier && eslint.