tsdx
twind
tsdx | twind | |
---|---|---|
45 | 30 | |
11,162 | 3,688 | |
0.2% | 0.4% | |
0.0 | 8.3 | |
11 months ago | 10 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
tsdx
-
ReactJS Good Practices
tsdx - Zero-config CLI for TypeScript package development
-
Help with bundling a module using webpack
If you’re into TypeScript, I highly recommend https://tsdx.io . I’ve used it to create a package before and it’s so much easier
-
Using Next.js components in a custom npm library
Thanks for the insight fellas. Aside question, I was thinking of bootstrapping the project with tsdx, but their last release was well over 2 years ago. Wondering if there are any alternative options for creating libraries?
-
Rollup Library Starter
NOTE: If your project uses TypeScript, I would suggest using tsdx instead.
-
Creating Modern npm Packages
Sadly, it's a bit dead. We switched to dts-cli fork, but tsup looks good too
-
TypeScript is terrible for library developers
I don't depend on the actual typescript docs much but thankfully in @types and in tons of repos there are examples of well written typescript code.
The amount of JS and TS out there is also a bit of a foot gun though so stick with heavily used/starred libs if you aren't sure.
One tool that helps a lot with developing libraries in typescript is TSDX[0] or its successor dts-cli[1] and there is a bunch of good stuff in awesesome-typescript[2].
Maybe library devving is harder?(more work?) with tyepscript but it is worth it for the end developer, especially if that end developer is you. If you aren't using your own libs then you're probably getting paid by someone else to make them or... idk.
https://github.com/jaredpalmer/tsdx
-
How to create your own React Components library
We will use a TSDX library - this tool is something similar to create-react-app, but for creating components library. It allows as to initialize a project immediately with already set up bundler, Rollup with Typescript supporting, testing with Jest, code formatter, Prettier and Storybook.
-
Is there a point in writing in TypeScript personal projects that I will maintain myself?
May be you need to try https://tsdx.io/
-
The Node ecosystem (still) has tooling problems
So what is the ideal way to build TypeScript libraries? I've heard that tsdx https://tsdx.io/ is quite good
-
React component library - 2022 where to start
There’s tsdx. But I’d recommend using Vite and storybook-vite
twind
- Twind – Tailwind without build step
-
Why We're Breaking Up with CSS-in-JS
I think TW syntax is great as a CSS shorthand. I think it can be a great tool for making highly descriptive styles in a far more succinct fashion. I think if you you use Twind compiler and you store TW syntax outside of your templates/JSX and you just compile it down to descriptive class names, that's a great use of Tailwind. Then you get the advantage of meaningful names applied to elements in the template, and if you need to refactor/fix a style, then you can find it much easier. It also makes it a lot more dynamic, which standard Tailwind which can be a PITA to make dynamic (e.g. for dynamic behavior in Twind, you can have functions that generate TW style strings and use interpolated strings without having to worry about if the build-time TW compiler understands all the possibilities).
- Por que usar Deno Fresh como framework web?
-
What programming languages do you use the most?
But at least you like something. And I get why people like Tailwind, but I end up finding it constricting for behavior that results in dynamic styles. But I've tried Twind which is a runtime TW compiler and it fixes most of my complaints and it has the same SSR-ability like Stitches & Emotion.
-
Why CSS-in-JS?
The CSS-in-JS library solves problems of global nature of CSS and of specificity by providing scoping in a unique class-name. It has some cost attached to it i.e run-time which is being solved by order libs vanilla-extract-css. I'm a big fan of tailwind and I honestly believe it is enough for your project. If you also need dynamic styles then CSS-in-JS is better over tailwind, though there are solutions like twind which provide a flavor of tailwind with the CSS-in-JS approach they do have all cons of any CSS-in- JS libraries. I'm very excited about styles by Facebook and waiting for the day it will be open-sourced or CSS itself evolves to me provide scoping and be more modular, until that day comes I'm betting on CSS-in-JS with stitches and vanilla-extract-css.
-
Styling in Fresh
what framwork are you coming from? i honestly wouldn’t try fresh unless you are using tailwind - bootstrap components are jsx based, and fresh is based off islands architecture which would make integrating the two trickier since youd have to route through deno + the preact compat lib. if you really want to do it, read into this. that being said, tailwind is a very powerful tool. i use it daily in nearly every element on front end, and as someone who likes avoiding design as much as possible ive found tailwind (and twind) are extremely pleasant to work with since it’s mostly class/keyword based styling as opposed to css / sass / scss styling
-
Looking to compile tailwind from a string if it detects any tailwindcss classes in it
I want to do something similar with Remix to make a separate stylesheet per route with content coming from a CMS like WordPress. I’ve had my eye on Twind once they add compatibility with v3 and all the JIT stuff. https://twind.dev/
-
A quick review of the Fresh web framework
When initializing a new project, Fresh will also ask if you want to use Twind, which is a Tailwind-to-JS library. If you choose this option, then you will have the power of Tailwind without creating a config file or using PostCSS, which I thought is pretty cool.
- Twind: The smallest, fastest, most feature complete tailwind-in-JS solution
-
tailwind: no simple way to get started
Try https://twind.dev/
What are some alternatives?
Microbundle - 📦 Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
turborepo - Incremental bundler and build system optimized for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust – including Turborepo and Turbopack. [Moved to: https://github.com/vercel/turbo]
twin.macro - 🦹♂️ Twin blends the magic of Tailwind with the flexibility of css-in-js (emotion, styled-components, solid-styled-components, stitches and goober) at build time.
parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀
stitches - [Not Actively Maintained] CSS-in-JS with near-zero runtime, SSR, multi-variant support, and a best-in-class developer experience.
tsup - The simplest and fastest way to bundle your TypeScript libraries.
windicss - Next generation utility-first CSS framework.
create-react-app - Set up a modern web app by running one command.
Bit - A build system for development of composable software.
nx - Smart Monorepos · Fast CI
tailwindcss-intellisense - Intelligent Tailwind CSS tooling for Visual Studio Code