ts-simple-type VS protobuf-ts

Compare ts-simple-type vs protobuf-ts and see what are their differences.

SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
surveyjs.io
featured
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
ts-simple-type protobuf-ts
3 13
35 948
- -
0.0 6.5
about 1 year ago 13 days ago
TypeScript TypeScript
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ts-simple-type

Posts with mentions or reviews of ts-simple-type. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-12.
  • tRPC – Move Fast and Break Nothing. End-to-end typesafe APIs made easy
    30 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Aug 2023
    We use an internal validator library that we infer request types from. It’s similar to Zod (but also predates it by a year).

    I’ve also spent some time on a Typescript type to X compiler. My first prototype is open source and targets Thrift, Proto3, Python, and JSON schema: https://github.com/justjake/ts-simple-type/tree/main/src/com...

    I’m not happy with the design decision in that codebase to try to “simplify” Typescript types before compiling, and probably won’t continue that implementation, but we have a few internal code generators that consume TS types and output test data builders and model clases we use in production.

  • Ezno
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Sep 2022
  • Ultra-minimal JSON schemas with TypeScript inference
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Jul 2022
    After some frustration with the TypeScript schema library ecosystem, I've decided that I'd prefer to declare my types using TypeScript's excellent type syntax, so I can take advantage of generics, mapped types, etc. Then, I'll take those TypeScript types and compile them to whatever alternative schema format I need.

    There are many libraries that claim to convert your Typescript types to other formats, such as ts-json-schema-generator, ts-to-zod, or typeconv/core-types-ts. These libraries work by interpreting the Typescript AST, essentially re-implementing a bare-bones type system from scratch. Most do not support advanced Typescript features like generic application, mapped types, or string literal types. So, what's the point? To avoid those limitations, I use Typescript's first-party ts.TypeChecker API to analyze types, and an existing library called ts-simple-type (which I've forked) to convert from ts.Type to a more usable intermediate format. Then, I recurse over the intermediate format and emit "AST nodes". It's pretty simple, but seems promising.

    So far, I have compilers from TypeScript type to Python 3 and Thrift. But I plan to add OpenAPI/JSONSchema, Protobuf (Proto3), Kotlin, Swift, and maybe Zod and Avro. Each target language is around ~300 LoC so they're pretty easy to put together.

    Repo: https://github.com/justjake/ts-simple-type

    Compiler input and output: https://github.com/justjake/ts-simple-type/blob/jake--compil...

    Thrift compiler: https://github.com/justjake/ts-simple-type/blob/jake--compil...

    Python compiler: https://github.com/justjake/ts-simple-type/blob/jake--compil...

protobuf-ts

Posts with mentions or reviews of protobuf-ts. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-12.
  • tRPC – Move Fast and Break Nothing. End-to-end typesafe APIs made easy
    30 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Aug 2023
    DX for front or back end? The beauty of tRPC is that the types are derived/inferred from the backend runtime code (like, as you type). It would be nigh impossible to do that with grpc(-web) using proto files as the source of truth.

    It's possible there's a project out there which could automatically produce proto files from something like zod, json-schema, etc. which could be directly interpreted by TS to provide similar (as you type) DX while still allowing some other language backend to consume the derived proto files (though the DX there would be less than ideal).

    If you're just looking for similar TS clients/interfaces for grpc-web then I'd recommend https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts which operates on plain JS objects (no new MyMessage().serialize(), instead the code generator mostly produces TS interfaces for you to work against: const myMessage: MyMessage = pojoConformingToInterface; const binary = MyMessage.toBinary(myMessage);)

  • Error using JWT Authentication using GRPC Web in .net 7; postman works - typescript client does not authorize
    1 project | /r/csharp | 28 Apr 2023
    https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts (RpcMetaData) https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts/blob/main/MANUAL.md
  • gRPC vs REST: Comparing API Styles in Practice
    6 projects | dev.to | 21 Feb 2023
    The second big difference is that we now have auto-generated client and server stubs. For this task, I chose to use buf and the protobuf-ts plugin in order to generate idiomatic Typescript classes and objects. Not only do these classes describe the types we'll use in the server and client, but also includes the actual gRPC implementations used to serialize and send messages back and forth across the wire.
  • Why are gRPC and Node.js so difficult?
    3 projects | /r/node | 5 Feb 2023
    I wouldn’t use grpc with web if you can avoid it. If you’re looking for a ts protobuf library I can recommend this one https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts
  • GRPC Gateway API Client?
    6 projects | /r/golang | 4 Feb 2023
  • Building a real-time bidding system with Socket.io and React Native
    1 project | /r/javascript | 15 Nov 2022
    https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts looks interesting too.
  • Connect-Web: ergonomic Protobuf & gRPC for browsers
    3 projects | /r/typescript | 4 Aug 2022
    I'd recommend looking into protobuf-ts (Timo from Buf) or protobuf-es (Buf maintained).
  • Rust GRPC
    1 project | /r/rust | 25 Jul 2022
    Use a GRPC library for frontend, assuming you want to go with Typescript take a look at https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts Frontend frameworks like Angular/React/Vue don't define what and how to implement backend communication. You can use what you want and how you want it.
  • Connect: A Better gRPC
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Jun 2022
    And there's also this which is by the same author but came before it: https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts

    The latter has code-generation for services and has various transport packages for twirp, grpc, and grpc-web.

  • Show HN: Pbkit – Protobuf toolkit written in Deno/TypeScript
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 5 Apr 2022
    This looks very interesting! Anything that can move people away from protobuf.js (which seems to no longer be maintained and depends on prototype values for "default values" meaning that you can't send deserialized protobuf messages to/from web workers) and the "native" JS codegen by Google (which produces code that is both very slow and a awkward to use) is a win in my book.

    We're currently using https://github.com/timostamm/protobuf-ts which has been fantastic. It's codegen is dependent on the protoc binary as it is implemented as a protoc plugin, but the code it generates passes the protobuf conformance tests. The generated code also outputs plain objects when deserializing protobuf messages which means it works perfectly when sending stuff to/from web workers. It also has grpc, grpc-web, and twirp clients.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ts-simple-type and protobuf-ts you can also consider the following projects:

fern-java - Generate Java models, clients, and server interfaces from your API definition.

ts-proto - An idiomatic protobuf generator for TypeScript

telefunc - Remote Functions. Instead of API.

ts-protoc-gen - Protocol Buffers Compiler (protoc) plugin for TypeScript and gRPC-Web.

ts-to-zod - Generate zod schemas from typescript types/interfaces

grpc-web - gRPC Web implementation for Golang and TypeScript

stytch-t3-example - An example app demonstrating how to use Stytch within the T3 stack

reflect-metadata - Prototype for a Metadata Reflection API for ECMAScript

vellum-client-python - Python SDK for Vellum API

deno-pbf - Deno pbf port of https://github.com/mapbox/pbf

vellum-client-generator - Vellum’s Fern API which is used to generate SDKs.

twirp - A simple RPC framework with protobuf service definitions