examples VS txtai

As another commenter noted, Milvus is overkill and a "bit much" if you're learning/playing.

A good intro to the field with progression towards a full Milvus implementation could be starting with towhee[0] (which is also supported by Milvus).

towhee has an example to do exactly what you want with CLIP[1].

[0] - https://towhee.io/

[1] - https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/tree/main/image/text_i...

Usually this is done in three steps. The first step is using a neural network to create a bounding box around the object, then generating vector embeddings of the object, and then using similarity search on vector embeddings.

The first step is accomplished by training a detection model to generate the bounding box around your object, this can usually be done by finetuning an already trained detection model. For this step the data you would need is all the images of the object you have with a bounding box created around it, the version of the object doesnt matter here.

The second step involves using a generalized image classification model thats been pretrained on generalized data (VGG, etc.) and a vector search engine/vector database. You would start by using the image classification model to generate vector embeddings (https://frankzliu.com/blog/understanding-neural-network-embe...) of all the different versions of the object. The more ground truth images you have, the better, but it doesn't require the same amount as training a classifier model. Once you have your versions of the object as embeddings, you would store them in a vector database (for example Milvus: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus).

Now whenever you want to detect the object in an image you can run the image through the detection model to find the object in the image, then run the sliced out image of the object through the vector embedding model. With this vector embedding you can then perform a search in the vector database, and the closest results will most likely be the version of the object.

Hopefully this helps with the general rundown of how it would look like. Here is an example using Milvus and Towhee https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/tree/3a2207d67b10a246f....

Disclaimer: I am a part of those two open source projects.

I have shown how to Build an Image Search Engine in Minutes in the previous tutorial. Here is another one for how to optimize the algorithm, feed it with large-scale image datasets, and deploy it as a micro-service.

The full tutorial is at https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/blob/main/image/reverse_image_search/build_image_search_engine.ipynb

I tend to agree with this sentiment. Many junior devs and/or those in college want to contribute. Then they feel entitled to merge a PR that they worked hard on often without guidance. I'm all for working with people but projects have standards and not all ideas make sense. In many cases, especially with commercial open source, the project is the base of a companies identity. So it's not just for drive-by ideas to pad a resume or finish a school project.

For those who do want to do this, I'd recommend writing an issue and/or reaching out to the developers to engage in a dialogue. This takes work but it will increase the likelihood of a PR being merged.

Disclaimer: I'm the primary developer of txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai), an open-source vector database + RAG framework

txtai is an all-in-one embeddings database for semantic search, LLM orchestration and language model workflows.

Bootstrapping only works if you have the runway to do it and you don't feel the need to grow fast.

With NeuML (https://neuml.com), I've went the bootstrapping route. I've been able to build a fairly successful open source project (txtai 6K stars https://github.com/neuml/txtai) and a revenue positive company. It's a "live within your means" strategy.

VC funding can have a snowball effect where you need more and more. Then you're in the loop of needing funding rounds to survive. The hope is someday you're acquired or start turning a profit.

I would say both have their pros and cons. Not all ideas have the luxury of time.

I agree that in many cases people are puffing their feathers to try to be something they're not (at least not yet). Some believe in the fake it until you make it mentality.

With NeuML (https://neuml.com), the website is a simple HTML page. On social media, I'm honest about what NeuML is, that I'm in my 40s with a family and not striving to be the next Steve Jobs. I've been able to build a fairly successful open source project (txtai 6K stars https://github.com/neuml/txtai) and a revenue positive company. For me, authenticity and being genuine is most important. I would say that being genuine has been way more of an asset than liability.

I'll add txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai) to the list.

There is still plenty of room for innovation in this space. Just need to focus on the right projects that are innovating and not the ones (re)working on problems solved in 2020/2021.

txtai is an all-in-one embeddings database for semantic search, LLM orchestration and language model workflows.

Nice project! I've long used Tika for document parsing given it's maturity and wide number of formats supported. The XHTML output helps with chunking documents for RAG.

Here's a couple examples:

- https://neuml.hashnode.dev/build-rag-pipelines-with-txtai

- https://neuml.hashnode.dev/extract-text-from-documents

Disclaimer: I'm the primary author of txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai).

If you're interested in graphs + RAG and want an alternate approach, txtai has a semantic graph component.

https://neuml.hashnode.dev/introducing-the-semantic-graph

https://github.com/neuml/txtai

Disclaimer: I'm the primary author of txtai