examples VS ann-benchmarks

As another commenter noted, Milvus is overkill and a "bit much" if you're learning/playing.

A good intro to the field with progression towards a full Milvus implementation could be starting with towhee[0] (which is also supported by Milvus).

towhee has an example to do exactly what you want with CLIP[1].

[0] - https://towhee.io/

[1] - https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/tree/main/image/text_i...

Usually this is done in three steps. The first step is using a neural network to create a bounding box around the object, then generating vector embeddings of the object, and then using similarity search on vector embeddings.

The first step is accomplished by training a detection model to generate the bounding box around your object, this can usually be done by finetuning an already trained detection model. For this step the data you would need is all the images of the object you have with a bounding box created around it, the version of the object doesnt matter here.

The second step involves using a generalized image classification model thats been pretrained on generalized data (VGG, etc.) and a vector search engine/vector database. You would start by using the image classification model to generate vector embeddings (https://frankzliu.com/blog/understanding-neural-network-embe...) of all the different versions of the object. The more ground truth images you have, the better, but it doesn't require the same amount as training a classifier model. Once you have your versions of the object as embeddings, you would store them in a vector database (for example Milvus: https://github.com/milvus-io/milvus).

Now whenever you want to detect the object in an image you can run the image through the detection model to find the object in the image, then run the sliced out image of the object through the vector embedding model. With this vector embedding you can then perform a search in the vector database, and the closest results will most likely be the version of the object.

Hopefully this helps with the general rundown of how it would look like. Here is an example using Milvus and Towhee https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/tree/3a2207d67b10a246f....

Disclaimer: I am a part of those two open source projects.

I have shown how to Build an Image Search Engine in Minutes in the previous tutorial. Here is another one for how to optimize the algorithm, feed it with large-scale image datasets, and deploy it as a micro-service.

The full tutorial is at https://github.com/towhee-io/examples/blob/main/image/reverse_image_search/build_image_search_engine.ipynb

On top of my head, pgvector only supports 2 indexes, those are running in memory only. They don't support GPU indexing, nor Disk based indexing, they also don't have separation of query and insertions.

Also with different people I've talked to, they struggle with scale past 100K-1M vector.

You can also have a look yourself from a performance perspective: https://ann-benchmarks.com/

https://ann-benchmarks.com/ is a good resource covering those libraries and much more.

We utilized the ANN Benchmarks methodology, a standard for benchmarking vector databases. Our tests used the dbpedia dataset of 1,000,000 OpenAI embeddings (1536 dimensions) and inner product distance metric for both Pinecone and pgvector.

Data warehouses are columnar stores. They are very different from row-oriented databases - like Postgres, MySQL. Operations on columns - e.g., aggregations (mean of a column) are very efficient.

Most vector databases use one of a few different vector indexing libraries - FAISS, hnswlib, and scann (google only) are popular. The newer vector dbs, like weaviate, have introduced their own indexes, but i haven't seen any performance difference -

Reference: https://ann-benchmarks.com/

(Blog author here). Thanks for the question. In this case the index for both DiskANN and pgvector HNSW is small enough to fit in memory on the machine (8GB RAM), so there's no need to touch the SSD. We plan to test on a config where the index size is larger than memory (we couldn't this time due to limitations in ANN benchmarks [0], the tool we use).

To your question about RAM usage, we provide a graph of index size. When enabling PQ, our new index is 10x smaller than pgvector HNSW. We don't have numbers for HNSWPQ in FAISS yet.

[0]: https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks/

In terms of "All You Need" for Vector Search, ANN Benchmarks (https://ann-benchmarks.com/) is a good site to review when deciding what you need. As with anything complex, there often isn't a universal solution.

txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai) can build indexes with Faiss, Hnswlib and Annoy. All 3 libraries have been around at least 4 years and are mature. txtai also supports storing metadata in SQLite, DuckDB and the next release will support any JSON-capable database supported by SQLAlchemy (Postgres, MariaDB/MySQL, etc).

pg_vector doesn't perform well compared to other methods, at least according to ANN-Benchmarks (https://ann-benchmarks.com/).

txtai is more than just a vector database. It also has a built-in graph component for topic modeling that utilizes the vector index to autogenerate relationships. It can store metadata in SQLite/DuckDB with support for other databases coming. It has support for running LLM prompts right with the data, similar to a stored procedure, through workflows. And it has built-in support for vectorizing data into vectors.

For vector databases that simply store vectors, I agree that it's nothing more than just a different index type.

The reason https://ann-benchmarks.com is so good, is that we can see a plot of recall vs latency. I can see you have some latency numbers in the leaderboard at the bottom, but it's very difficult to make a decision.

As a practitioner that works with vector databases every day, just latency is meaningless to me, because I need to know if it's fast AND accurate, and what the tradeoff is! You can't have it both ways. So it would be helpful if you showed plots showing this tradeoff, similar to ann-benchmarks.