torrent-paradise
bittorrent-dht
torrent-paradise | bittorrent-dht | |
---|---|---|
15 | 3 | |
407 | 1,199 | |
- | 0.4% | |
0.0 | 5.8 | |
4 months ago | 23 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
torrent-paradise
-
Ask HN: I've Built a DHT Torrent Sniffer and Search Engine. Should I Release?
There’s also this which has since gone down but remains up on IPFS and its index hasn’t updated since January…
https://github.com/urbanguacamole/torrent-paradise
https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmQjsKamNFZRvCMXDvZXQmRYjsm...
-
Torrent Paradise 2.0 is dead
For what its worth the source code is still up if anyone wants to create a new site using the code https://github.com/urbanguacamole/torrent-paradise
- I made a decentralized torrent search site with IPFS
-
Any replacement for Torrent Paradise ml ?
For years after we missed torrentz.eu, torrent-paradise.ml was my best torrent search engine. Clean, powerful and uptodate. Sadly it is disabpear in mid january 2022 for reason that I don't know. I'm wondering if there is any clone/alternatives, as the source code is available here
-
Please seed a backup of Torrent Paradise
The code and instructions are still at https://github.com/urbanguacamole/torrent-paradise
-
Database-Less Torrent Website
related: https://torrent-paradise.ml/ Also based on IPFS with this HTTP gateway. I find a lot of torrents in there.
-
Torrent Search Engines
Torrent Paradise
-
Did they really thought we will pay for all of this
I'm only on private, invite only torrent sites right now, so I'm not much help with regard to public trackers. I do have https://torrent-paradise.ml/ bookmarked which seems to be an aggregator of many other trackers.
- Privacy using our Tor-inspired onion routing
-
Please add Torrent Paradise in Synclers provider packages...
It would be great to add this very interesting and valuable torrent site in already awesome provider packages for Syncler. Here is the link for the site https://torrent-paradise.ml/
bittorrent-dht
- Theseus DHT Protocol
-
Static torrent website with peer-to-peer queries over BitTorrent on 2M records
I'm not talking about the consensus protocol of the blockchain itself, but of the p2p algorithms underlying it, e.g. using Kademlia for service discovery and message routing. I'm asking why a distributed system would choose something like Consul (which uses Raft, and requires a coordinator node) instead of running a decentralized protocol like Kademlia (which has no coordinator nodes) within their distributed single-tenant environment.
I did a bit more research last night, and discovered that Bitfinex actually does something like this internally (anyone know if this is up to date?) [0] — they built a service discovery mesh by storing arbitrary data on a DHT implementing BEP44 (using webtorrent/bittorrent-dht [1]).
This seems pretty cool to me, and IMO any modern distributed system should consider running decentralized protocols to benefit from their robustness properties. Deploying a node to a decentralized protocol requires no coordination or orchestration, aside from it simply joining the network. Scaling a service is as simple as joining a node to the network and announcing its availability of an implementation of that service.
At first glance, this looks like a competitive advantage, because it decouples the operational and maintenance costs of the network from the size of the network.
So I'm wondering if there is a consistent tradeoff in exchange for this robustness — are decentralized applications more complex to implement but simpler to operate? Is latency of decentralized protocols (e.g. average number of hops to lookup item in a DHT) untenably higher than that of distributed protocols (e.g. one hop once to get instructions from coordinator, then one hop to lookup item in distributed KV)? Does a central coordinator eliminate some kind of principle agent problem, resulting in e.g. a more balanced usage of the hashing keyspace?
Decentralization emerged because distributed solutions fail in untrusted environments — but this doesn't mean that decentralized solutions fail in trusted environments. So why not consider more decentralized protocols to scale internal systems?
[0] https://github.com/bitfinexcom/grenache
[1] https://github.com/webtorrent/bittorrent-dht
-
Decentralized in-browser torrent site
Yes the database is fixed. I would like to make it updateable using web2web or mutable torrents (BEP44) which the WebTorrent DHT supports.
What are some alternatives?
Magnetico - Autonomous (self-hosted) BitTorrent DHT search engine suite.
webtorrent - ⚡️ Streaming torrent client for the web
tribler - Privacy enhanced BitTorrent client with P2P content discovery
ipfs-pubsub-room - IPFS Pubsub room
torrenthistory-public
bittorrent-tracker - 🌊 Simple, robust, BitTorrent tracker (client & server) implementation
i2p.i2p - I2P is an anonymizing network, offering a simple layer that identity-sensitive applications can use to securely communicate. All data is wrapped with several layers of encryption, and the network is both distributed and dynamic, with no trusted parties.
webtorrent - ⚡️ Streaming torrent client for the web [Moved to: https://github.com/webtorrent/webtorrent]
passerby - Peer-to-peer location services for the decentralized web -- discover what's around you, no central authority required
webtorrent-desktop - ❤️ Streaming torrent app for Mac, Windows, and Linux
orbitdb - Peer-to-Peer Databases for the Decentralized Web
rats-search - BitTorrent P2P multi-platform search engine for Desktop and Web servers with integrated torrent client.