tmate VS asciinema

Have you tried https://tmate.io/ ? It's a fork of tmux that, on startup, gives you web links and ssh connection strings to connect to the session. For each connection method you get one adress for read-only access and one for normal access.

$ apt-cache show tmate [...] Homepage: http://tmate.io/ Description-en: terminal multiplexer with instant terminal sharing tmate provides an instant pairing solution, allowing you to share a terminal with one or several teammates. Together with a voice call, it's almost like pairing in person. The terminal sharing works by using SSH connections to backend servers maintained by tmate upstream developers; teammates need to be given a randomly-generated token to be able to join a session. . tmate is a modified version of tmux, and uses the same configurations such as keybindings, color schemes etc.

Checkout https://tmate.io/

> https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-server

and

> Web player for terminal session recordings

It's not mine, it's asciinema, lol. I tried finding it, but fell short, look around here https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-server/tree/develop/assets/css.

I've used the script command and asciinema [1] before. Easy way to record steps without missing anything.

[1] https://asciinema.org/

You're welcome! I just stumbled across another one that looks promising, too: https://asciinema.org/

Check out https://asciinema.org, a tool for recording terminal commands.

These days I reluctantly prefer embedding a static screenshot in my READMEs with a link to an asciinema animation. They're easy enough to record, and at least I'm not costing some poor sod who accidentally loaded my page $0.10 to download a giant GIF on mobile data.

I you'd like to know what it is like to use Podman, I've found those Asciinema snippets by Matthew Heon (Podman contributor) quite helpful: https://asciinema.org/~mheon