tldr-sh-client VS snapdrop

Compare tldr-sh-client vs snapdrop and see what are their differences.

tldr-sh-client

Simplified and community-driven man pages (by raylee)

snapdrop

A Progressive Web App for local file sharing (by RobinLinus)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
tldr-sh-client snapdrop
3 430
701 17,383
- -
4.3 0.0
4 months ago about 1 month ago
Shell JavaScript
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

tldr-sh-client

Posts with mentions or reviews of tldr-sh-client. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-04-25.
  • your favorite cheatsheet app ?
    2 projects | /r/commandline | 25 Apr 2022
    I like tldr with sh client. Simple and POSIX compliant.
  • Node.js packages don't deserve your trust
    40 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Apr 2022
    > While I find projects in those other languages to also have too many dependencies, it's no where near what happens in JS apps. I'm thinking of projects I've recently worked on in Rust, PHP, and Java.

    My experience with these new languages is such that this feels a bit unfair. It's like insisting that a disaster with 1000 fatalities is "much worse" than one with "only". It's ... true ... I guess, but there's something uncomfortable about making the comparison. Something has gone badly wrong if the comparison even needs to happen in the first place.

    What I'm getting at is that e.g. Rust has an enormous problem in this area. It's not uncommon for me to see Node projects with over a thousand transitive dependencies, but on the other hand, I very frequently see Rust projects with over a hundred. And the Node projects tend to be more complicated than the Rust ones; they do more.

    Take the last Rust program I tried to use, tealdeer. [1] If you don't know, tldr is a project that provides alternative simplified man pages for commonly used programs that consist entirely of easy to understand examples for the program. [2] What a tldr client needs to do is simply to check a local cache for each lookup, and if necessary update the cache online. It's a trivial problem that can be, and has been! [3], solved in a few hundred lines of shell (if you're being extremely verbose). How many recursive dependencies would you guess tealdeer uses? Depends on how you count, of course, but as of today the answer is ~133 deduplicated dependencies! For a program that's a glorified wrapper around curl!

    Or another Rust program I looked at recently, rua [4]. In Arch Linux, the AUR is a repository of user maintained scripts for building and installing software as native Arch packages. Official tools for the building and installing software already exist for Arch, but it is common for users to use a wrapper around these tools that makes fetching and updating the software from the AUR easier. It's a relatively simple task that (once again) can be done with shell scripts. rua is such a wrapper. As of today it uses 137 deduplicated dependencies!

    These Rust programs are simple terminal tools to do tasks that are almost trivial in nature. And yet they require hundreds of constantly updating dependencies! The situation may well be better than what you'll find for Node, but it's undeniably disastrous compared to either simpler languages without a built in package manager (like C) or more complicated batteries-included languages where best practices continue to prevail (like Python).

    [1] https://github.com/dbrgn/tealdeer

    [2] https://tldr.sh/

    [3] https://github.com/raylee/tldr-sh-client/blob/main/tldr

    [4] https://github.com/vn971/rua

  • unlimited power
    11 projects | /r/linuxmemes | 17 Jul 2021
    Bash https://github.com/raylee/tldr-sh-client

snapdrop

Posts with mentions or reviews of snapdrop. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-31.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tldr-sh-client and snapdrop you can also consider the following projects:

opendrop - An open Apple AirDrop implementation written in Python

sharedrop - Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC - inspired by Apple AirDrop

cheat.sh - the only cheat sheet you need

PairDrop - PairDrop: Local file sharing in your browser. Inspired by Apple's AirDrop. Fork of Snapdrop.

proposal-ses - Draft proposal for SES (Secure EcmaScript)

LANDrop - Drop any files to any devices on your LAN.

rua - Build tool for Arch Linux providing control, review and jailed build options

localsend - An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

navi-tldr-pages - tldr-pages for navi, an interactive cheatsheet tool for the command-line

libreddit - Private front-end for Reddit

termux-app - Termux - a terminal emulator application for Android OS extendible by variety of packages.

updog - Updog is a replacement for Python's SimpleHTTPServer. It allows uploading and downloading via HTTP/S, can set ad hoc SSL certificates and use http basic auth.