TinyGo
pushup
TinyGo | pushup | |
---|---|---|
95 | 17 | |
14,510 | 832 | |
1.2% | 0.4% | |
9.3 | 6.6 | |
2 days ago | 15 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
TinyGo
- Gokrazy – Go Appliances
-
A "Tiny" APISIX Plugin
Reading through the documentation, you will understand why this plugin is called "tiny," i.e., the SDK uses the TinyGo compiler instead of the official Go compiler. You can read more about why this is the case on the SDK\'s overview page, but the TLDR version is that the Go compiler can only produce Wasm binaries that run in the browser.
-
What's Zig got that C, Rust and Go don't have? [video]
Not only you can fit Go into a kernel, there is at least two products that do so.
TamaGo, used to write the firmware used in USB armory.
https://www.withsecure.com/en/solutions/innovative-security-...
TinyGo, which even has official Arduino and ARM support, and is sponsored by Google
https://tinygo.org/
Ah but that isn't proper Go! Well neither is the C code that is allowed to be used in typical kernel code, almost nothing from ISO C standard library is available, and usually plenty of compiler specific language extensions are used instead.
-
Show HN: A new stdlib for Golang focusing on platform native support
Reminds me of https://tinygo.org/ - a project that brings Golang to embedded devices, browser (wasm) contexts. Do you converge or diverge from that project?
- TinyGo release 0.29 is out
-
Pico with C
You should also consider TinyGo. It can compile Go for the Pico, and is starting to get good device support.
-
Rust 1.71.0
Thankfully some folks completly ignored whatever the rest of the world thinks system programming is all about and created:
- TinyGo (https://tinygo.org/), which is acknowledged by people in the industry[0][1]
- TamaGo unikernel on USB Armory secure key (https://www.withsecure.com/de/solutions/innovative-security-...)
And then there is the question if writing compilers, assemblers, linkers is systems programming or not.
[0]-https://www.cnx-software.com/2019/08/28/tinygo-go-compiler-f...
[1]-https://twitter.com/ArmSoftwareDev/status/131680481331796787...
-
When would you (not) recommend Go over Rust?
Have you seen TinyGo? In the case of embedded system I would probably still chose C over Rust if the system didn't support dynamic memory allocation, and most embedded systems do not.
-
“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis Ritchie
>I really hate how for microcontrollers the only two choices are either C++ or Micropython
There's TinyGo as well. https://tinygo.org/
-
WebAssembly System Interface (WASI) with sockets for Go
Gist link fixed, thanks. Compared to TinyGo, Go with GOOS=wasip1 will probably generate larger artifacts (at least, for now). This is because it bundles the entire Go runtime. The benefit is that it fully supports goroutine scheduling and non-blocking I/O. TinyGo (I believe) still uses a custom asyncify pass and does not support non-blocking I/O nor basic WASI networking (e.g. https://github.com/tinygo-org/tinygo/pull/2748 never landed, but GOOS=wasip1 supports it).
pushup
-
Show HN: Build progressively enhanced reactive HTML apps using Go and Alpine.js
I think this is adding unnecessary complexity. One of the reasons developers gravitate towards a framework like Alpine or HTMX is to write less JS and go back to enjoying HTML. Of course there are a lot of use cases that require custom JS scripting. But bootstrapping a project with another Go web framework and adding Alpine is also trivial. But keep going and follow your vision. I love these types of projects. Check this one out:
https://pushup.adhoc.dev
It's got some unique ideas.
-
Pushup Offers Speed of Go in Web Development Framework
This strikes me as incredibly clever.
The compiler and code-generation implementation seems equally straightforward and complex, my mind is racing trying to build a mental model of the whole thing.
The code generation comes after a feature-packed parser and "compilation" step. Emitting go source code is nice because subsequent compilation tells you if its valid or not. I'm wondering if there is a specific reason the "framework" source code is emitted via a series of printf calls[0]. A library of go template "fragments" might be easier to manage (and debug).
[0] https://github.com/adhocteam/pushup/blob/0519a782c1c9fc79877...
- Golang tech stack
- Best front-end stack for Golang backend
- Pushup – A server-side, page-oriented web framework for Go
- Pushup: a new compiler for making web apps in Go
- Pushup: a new compiler for building web apps in go
- First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making web apps in Go
What are some alternatives?
MicroPython - MicroPython - a lean and efficient Python implementation for microcontrollers and constrained systems
svelte-mpa - Svelte MPA, Multipage Svelte
go - The Go programming language
CS35L-Project
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
micropython-ulab - a numpy-like fast vector module for micropython, circuitpython, and their derivatives
yaegi-template - Use yaegi as a template engine.
awesome-micropython - A curated list of awesome MicroPython libraries, frameworks, software and resources.
bob - SQL query builder and ORM/Factory generator for Go with support for PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite
PlatformIO - Your Gateway to Embedded Software Development Excellence :alien:
go_clean_architecture - Go Clean Architecture Used at @wesionaryteam