tini VS multirun

yes busybox httpd or civetweb is even smaller, both around 300kb.

for tini you mean https://github.com/krallin/tini? how large is your final docker image, why not just alpine in that case which is musl+busybox

Tini, a useful process manager for containerized apps

Ah gotcha. I believe it can be baked into images as well, per the entrypoint example in the readme: https://github.com/krallin/tini

Not sure how this will fare IRL in k8s as I haven’t much experience there. It’s still silly that this is the default behavior where you need something like Tini, but I digress.

To be fair, even for running a single process the pitfalls are real. I've been seeing Tini[1] a lot for these situations.

I just read in the README that Tini is included by Docker since 1.13 if using --init flag.

[1] https://github.com/krallin/tini

The default init process used is the first docker-init executable found in the system path of the Docker daemon process. This docker-init binary, included in the default installation, is backed by tini.

AFAIK It's for the init process to reparent zombie processes. See TINI

The second easiest (and most common when your entry point is a bash script) is to use a fake init tool like tini

I recently switched to multirun [1] which in my case is superior to supervisor. I don't have to create any config files anymore, and it behaves exactly as i want it to: If one on the processes dies the complete container will die and docker's restart-policy takes place.

[1] https://github.com/nicolas-van/multirun