tilt VS lens

Could improve that crappy feedback loop :)

If the language runtimes are compiled you can't do this, but if not, in theory you shouldn't need such a stupidly long core development feedback loop.

I'm a huge fan of https://tilt.dev/ and the possibilities it unlocks for that pre-commit development.

Something like https://tilt.dev/ where you spin up a subset of the service graph in a cloud environment that hot-reloads based on local edits.

To get a similar experience of preevy up, first we’ll need to split the build and deploy using process or alternatively employ tools that orchestrate build-tag-push-update-sync flow like Skaffold/Tilt.

It's not a direct competitor, but we use https://tilt.dev/ at my company for local and remote development.

For local testing you use tilt that runs stateful services locally in a kind k8s cluster. That same config can deploy to a remote k8s server to easily share a preview of new features, which is useful for prototyping things that might not necessarily ever be merged.

There are dedicated tools just for that. Apart from skaffold check also tilt.dev, garden.io, devspace.sh, okteto.com

You basically start by downloading kind, then tilt. Then create a kind cluster with the provided configuration in the tilt repo. Then run tilt up and that's it. You'll have a fully functional Kubernetes cluster and project running complete with deployments and services. Nothing too fancy, no RBAC, no network policies etc.. Just the bare minimum to get you up and running.

I recommend also looking into tilt.

Second, and perhaps the best of all is, that I created a tilt repository located here.

But apart from the other "k8s in a box" options (like minikube, k0s, ...) you could also have a look at tilt (https://tilt.dev/), it sounds like this might be a good fit for your use case as well.

Lens

Generally I felt as if I was diving in the deepest of waters without the correct equipement and that was horrifying. Unfortunately to me, I had to dive even deeper before getting equiped with tools like ArgoCD, and k8slens. I had to start working with... HELM.

Indeed you can, with several "paid" features removed, like log tailing and pod shells. They deliberately hobbled the product. If you want to use Lens, my advice is pay for the supported version.

yes I know there is lens, but it does not allow me to see logs of multiple pods at same time and what is even more important it is not friendly for ephemeral clusters - in my case with help of kind I am recreating whole cluster each time from scratch

Let's wait for few seconds for the pods to become green, I am using Lens, it's awesome btw.

You probably don't need Rancher unless you need a GUI or manage multiple clusters, Lens or k9s might be a better fit for your use case.

`openlens` is now preferred over `Lens`, it has everything you need and none of the fluff that Lens wants to charge you for.