gut VS pollyjs

I'm starting to get confused with all the git clients/wrapper out there I first thought you would be https://github.com/sdslabs/gut/ or maybe https://github.com/tillberg/gut or https://github.com/quilicicf/Gut

Choosing a name is hard and all the gut ones are taken (haha...), but maybe at least choose one that isn't used multiple times for the same use case. You probably wrote kt for yourself and I name my programs however I like as well, but man you even registered a domain for it. Let's hope it finds more traction than all the other gut clients

This was exactly my use case for building gut, https://github.com/tillberg/gut. It's a daemon that wraps git, auto-committing changes for a tree and bidirectionally syncing them between N computers. The wrapped git is autorenamed from git to gut so that it can commit git folders. The gut tools are usable for exploring/manipulating history of this meta-repo, too. I saved myself from disaster a couple times with `gut checkout ...`.

Nowadays I use Syncthing for the same purpose (I learned about Syncthing when I did a Show HN for gut). Dropbox works reasonably well, too.

They "pushed" out this project in 2018

https://github.com/Netflix/pollyjs/commit/281115d359ee0da5e0...

For me it's about how fast I can read though a list of commits and get a sense for what happened. A uniform prefix really helps if you need to write release notes, for example. Check out:

https://github.com/Netflix/pollyjs/commits/master

Here I can quickly tell which commits are features or bug fixes, even if the rest of the message is slow/hard to parse.

Versus:

https://github.com/openai/whisper/commits/main

I sometimes need to parse a couple words before I can figure it out.

The emoji on the repo look quite varied, which is fun, but I think stricter use could be productive.