gut
git-branchless
gut | git-branchless | |
---|---|---|
3 | 55 | |
321 | 3,308 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 9.4 | |
about 2 years ago | 6 days ago | |
Go | Rust | |
ISC License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gut
-
Show HN: Gut – An easy-to-use CLI for Git
I'm starting to get confused with all the git clients/wrapper out there I first thought you would be https://github.com/sdslabs/gut/ or maybe https://github.com/tillberg/gut or https://github.com/quilicicf/Gut
Choosing a name is hard and all the gut ones are taken (haha...), but maybe at least choose one that isn't used multiple times for the same use case. You probably wrote kt for yourself and I name my programs however I like as well, but man you even registered a domain for it. Let's hope it finds more traction than all the other gut clients
-
Show HN: A version control system based on rsync
This was exactly my use case for building gut, https://github.com/tillberg/gut. It's a daemon that wraps git, auto-committing changes for a tree and bidirectionally syncing them between N computers. The wrapped git is autorenamed from git to gut so that it can commit git folders. The gut tools are usable for exploring/manipulating history of this meta-repo, too. I saved myself from disaster a couple times with `gut checkout ...`.
Nowadays I use Syncthing for the same purpose (I learned about Syncthing when I did a Show HN for gut). Dropbox works reasonably well, too.
- Gut: Realtime bidirectional file synchronization based on Git
git-branchless
-
Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
Yes, but due to its simplicity + extensibility + widespread adoption, I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re still using Git 100+ years from now.
The current trend (most popular and IMO likely to succeed) is to make tools (“layers”) which work on top of Git, like more intuitive UI/patterns (https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit, https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless) and smart merge resolvers (https://github.com/Symbolk/IntelliMerge, https://docs.plasticscm.com/semanticmerge/how-to-configure/s...). Git it so flexible, even things that it handles terribly by default, it handles
- Meta developer tools: Working at scale
- Show HN: Gut – An easy-to-use CLI for Git
-
Branchless Workflow for Git
> Is this for a case where a bunch of people branch from master@HEAD (lets call this A), then you need to modify A, so you then need to rebase each branch that branched from A individually?
Mainly it's for when you branch from A multiple times, and then modify A. This can happen if you have some base work that you build multiple features on top of. I routinely do this as part of rapid prototyping, as described here: https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless/wiki/Workflow:-div...
`git undo` shows a list of operations it'll execute, which you have to confirm before accepting. Of course, it's ultimately a matter of trust in the tools you use.
- Where are my Git UI features from the future?
- git-branchless: High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
- git-branchless
-
Show HN: Maiao, Stacked Diffs for GitHub
What happens is you work somewhere that has stacked diffs and suddenly you learn how to shape your diffs to make them easy to review. Thinking of how folks will review your code in chunks while writing it makes it cleaner. Having small but easy to read diffs makes reviews faster and helps junior devs learn how to review.
Sometimes this doesn’t happen in which case you end up need to split your commit at the end. This is where git utterly fails. You end up needing git split and git absorb to make this productive.
Git split let’s you select which chunks in a commit should belong to it and then splits that into a commit and then you do it again and again until you have lots of commits. You’ll still need to probably test each one but the majority of the work is done
Git absorb takes changes on the top of your stack and magically finds which commit in your stack the each chunk should belong to and amends it to the right commit
You also need git branchless https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless as it lets you move up and down the stack without needing to remember so much git arcana.
- High velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
What are some alternatives?
Gut - Ein Gut git Fluss
graphite-cli - Graphite's CLI makes creating and submitting stacked changes easy.
envkey - Simple, end-to-end encrypted configuration and secrets management
jj - A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful
gut - A version control system with gut feeling.
magit - It's Magit! A Git Porcelain inside Emacs.
got - Got is like git, but with an 'o'
vimagit - Ease your git workflow within Vim
gitless - A maintained fork of the simple git interface
lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands
libgit2 - A cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git that you can use in your application.
legit - Git for Humans, Inspired by GitHub for Mac™.