thinkfan VS asus-ec-sensors

I use Thinkfan on my T420, T440, X230 and X1 that run Linux. I linked the author's github page, but I believe it's available straight from the package manager in Ubuntu/Mint, so elementary might have it too

For Linux: thinkfan

I have found Thinkfan seems to be a good way to control Thinkpad fans on Ubuntu. https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan

Solved that with Thinkfan (https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan)

The second solution on this page probably isn't reliable, because hwmon paths like `hwmon3` depend on module load order.

That's likely the same reason for the `card*` workaround mentioned above.

I am using thinkfan for this and it works really well: https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan

I wrote about it here: https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan/issues/190

As thinkfan (https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan) doesn't come prepackaged with my Debian version I tried to build it myself. I installed all the libraries as instructed in the README file, and followed the build instructions. Running cmake works fine, but then when I run make I get the following linker error that I cannot solve no matter what I try (this is actually my first time building a project!):

you can learn more about the configuration file here: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Fan_speed_control/thinkfan https://github.com/vmatare/thinkfan/blob/master/examples/thinkfan.yaml

Seems good to me, is there any reason you are not waiting for a 13700K(F) ? Also for the motherboard you would be able to benefit from asus-ec-sensors by swapping your motherboard for a ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 (if the price difference is acceptable and of course it’s available where you are).

As you can see the CPUIN of nct6798 is 45C while the Tdie reported by Zenpower is 57C. This is during a stress test and it seems like the Zenpower reported value makes more sense than the nct value. However I have also built and installed https://github.com/zeule/asus-ec-sensors and it seems to match the value reported by nct6798. But it just seems like both of them are a little low for a stress test although the system is watercooled, the Zenpower output makes more sense... Anyone knows what is going on here ? perhaps one is reported "CPU package" while the other is reporting "CPU core" or something ?