Testcontainers VS WireMock

There are a handful of ways to start Testcontainers, including JUnit4 annotations, JUnit5 annotations, ApplicationContextInitializer, JDBC URL scheme, and manual container lifecycle control. Let's choose manual control for now as the least "magic" option:

Repository

except the parent is wrong (at least the Java impl). see:

https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/blob/m...

https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/blob/m...

> I wonder if Rancher Desktop, et al, works with testcontainers.org?

I don't use testcontainers myself, but it looks like as long as you are using Rancher Desktop >= 1.0.1 you should be just fine.[1]

[1] https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/issues...

Thanks for the feedback. You are right, and there are some other mock-up alternatives as well, a good one for developers https://testcontainers.com/

In this article, we will explore how to use Testcontainers and Exposed, a lightweight ORM framework for Kotlin, to create a controlled environment for testing MySQL Database operations.

Unfortunately, it still remains hard to use Testcontainers because of how wedded it is to junit4, five years after the release of junit 5. https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-java/issues/970

Finally, we put the directory with generated contents (HTML, CSS, JS) into a tarball. Testcontainers library allows to copy files from a container to the OS but not directories. That’s why we need an archive inside the SchemaSpy container.

This repository provides a BuildImageTest that uses the buildpack to create a native image. It then tests the native image, using Testcontainers and JUnit. Building the native image with AOT processing, as part of a test, takes minutes not seconds, and should not be part of normal "inner loop" development. So the BuildImageTest is in a separate sourceSet and can be executed independently. This is a very powerful pattern, that I'm just getting started with. I would love to hear your thoughts on this pattern or other alternatives to it.

The list goes on. Check out the full list of Testcontainer modules.

公式サイト / GitHub：https://wiremock.org

On a new project, I decided to re-evaluate my options, and remembered a tool that seems to be the next best thing for the job: Wiremock.

mocha is a lib inspired by nock and WireMock. It allows checking if the mock was called or not, which is a nice feature. Like httptest, it also it don't automatically intercept the requests.

For testing third-party API calls, you can use libraries such as WireMock or Nock. These tools allow you to simulate HTTP requests and responses, helping you test how your application behaves when interacting with an external service. For example, you can mock successful responses, simulate errors, or test timeouts, all without making real HTTP requests.

WireMock is a versatile, open-source platform for API mocking, offering powerful simulation features for both HTTP and HTTPS protocols. It’s highly customizable and is especially well-suited for complex use cases, such as testing microservices architectures and handling advanced behaviors.

To write my unit tests I used framework called JUnit5. JUnit5 is programmer-friendly testing framework for Java and the JVM. To test my API I had to create a mock server, WireMock framework helped me with it which is integrated with JUnit5. WireMock is a tool for mocking HTTP services.