test-ci-needs VS xmonad

Compare test-ci-needs vs xmonad and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
test-ci-needs xmonad
1 76
- 3,251
- 0.5%
- 7.8
- 5 days ago
Haskell
- BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

test-ci-needs

Posts with mentions or reviews of test-ci-needs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-08.
  • GitHub Actions Limitations and Gotchas
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Sep 2021
    Sorry, it was with `only:changes` and `needs`. Take a look at this issue[0] and this pipeline[1]. I've failed to find the failure mode in the documentation, so I suppose it may have been fixed since then - but we've developed an in-house workaround in the meantime that I'd trust a lot more than anything coming out from Gitlab.

    --------

    > A monorepo isn't "all but the most simple use-cases", it's usually a fairly complex usecase, and Gitlab have a myriad of ways to make monorepo CI easier - dynamic pipelines, remote triggers, includes, etc.

    And every single feature you've mentioned here has a bug when combined with something else. That's the problem with Gitlab CI: everything works in isolation, but nothing composes properly.

    Take includes: they don't work with anchors, so you couldn't have a generic template rules in the "main" file getting reused in the included files. This makes sense though! Anchors are a yaml feature. So gitlab added their own pseudo-anchors, called `extends`. You'd assume a smart, context-aware merge to happen, but no! Gitlab decided to go with a dumb object merge. Because the `script` step is a list of string, if both the parent and the child specify a `script`, only the child's will be used! Gitlab has a `before_script` step which can be used to workaround the issue for single levels of inheritance, but anything more complex ends up in a dead end. This feels like a feature that's been bolted on without any sort of design work.

    [0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/31310

    [1]: https://gitlab.com/ensc/test-ci-needs/-/pipelines/78713602

xmonad

Posts with mentions or reviews of xmonad. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-04.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing test-ci-needs and xmonad you can also consider the following projects:

github-action-tester - Run tests when pull-requests are opened, or commits pushed.

Hyprland - Hyprland is a highly customizable dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on its looks.

act - Run your GitHub Actions locally 🚀

i3 - A tiling window manager for X11

actions-runner-controller - Kubernetes controller for GitHub Actions self-hosted runners

dotfiles-2.0 - XMonad™️. Widgets go brr.

turnstyle - 🎟️A GitHub Action for serializing workflow runs

Arch-Linux-xmonad-setup-guide

actions-runner-

dotfiles

jenkins-std-lib - Bringing the Zen of Python to Jenkins.

xmonad-contrib - Contributed modules for xmonad