terrateam VS terraform

Terrateam: After getting into some really big issues when running Terragrunt with Github Actions, I decided to look for a better CI solution. Terrateam is my CI/CD tool of choice here. Unfortunately as of December 2023, they increased their price from USD $175 to USD $496 monthly. Me being an existing customer I still pay the old amount (thank God!) Alternatively, you can look at solutions like Atlantis or spacelift.

Disclaimer: I am a co-founder of Terrateam (https://terrateam.io/) a competitor to Digger.

For anyone using Digger, are all of the enterprise features in the open source codebase? If you pay for digger, or you just paying for support and hosting? Or do they separate OSS from Community, Pro, and Enterprise plans?

Disclaimer: Co-founder of Terrateam.

For Terrateam[0], we have probably 70% of the enterprise offering but at around 1/10th the price. If there are any features that are deal breaker, feel free to reach out to me and we'll see what we can do. That being said, Spacelift is a much more luxurious piece of software than us. We are very utilitarian, but we have to rationalize that low price-point somehow.

[0] https://terrateam.io

Terrateam is an enterprise Atlantis alternative that lets you plan and apply all within pull requests and very minimal setup. We have a pretty active slack if you have any questions.

> It sure looks like AWS admin credentials are shared with Github, and also available to anything else in the diggerhq/digger action

I am a co-founder of Terrateam[0] which is a Terraform CI/CD as well. At the end of the day, you need to execute something to do these operations and having this component open source is important for auditing purposes. For Terrateam, we lean heavily into GitHub Actions so GitHub is at least managing any secrets and runs. One challenge is users could pin the Action that we publish to a specific version, but we also update it regularly and communicating to customers to update it is a challenge.

[0] https://terrateam.io

There are lots of options for this. I am co-founder of a product called Terrateam which makes it easy to slice up a mono repo for these usecases. We specialize in GitHub installations. But Spacelift, env0, and Scalr exist as options as well.

Many of the CI/CD tools take care of this. Terrateam tracks which plans are still valid after an apply and will force a re-plan. It also ensures that only one apply happens at a time.

We just released our self-hosted version available here: https://github.com/terrateamio/terrateam

I use Terrateam (disclaimer, I'm also a co-founder of it) does PR-level locks (but only on apply, or merge), and does apply serialization, and invalidates outdated plans on apply. You can plan as much as you want in parallel, though, because that does not impact the output. I don't think there are many other options for how to handle this.

I am not only a big fan of hashicorp terraform. I'm also one of the early adopters of it. So this is my main go-to Infrastructure as a Code tool. However all the resources I use are supported by other IaaC solutions such as AWS CloudFormation and AWS CDK. You definitely got to use one to avoid loosing the track of resources you create.

State Encryption was one of those long requested features[0] (I had it on my ideas list for years[1]) that Hashicorp didn't have much incentive to build. I don't think it has to with distancing opentofu as such, but the opentofu team prioritizing the right things that customers actually need.

[0]: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/9556

[1]: https://github.com/captn3m0/ideas#-mars-terraform-remote-htt...

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/34402

I’m not a lawyer and have no idea who is right or wrong but I understand why Hashicorp is scrutinizing this.

Just to give an example of the power of Go for CLI builds, you may have already used or at least heard of Docker, Kubernetes, Prometheus, Terraform, but what do they all have in common? They all have a large part of their usability via CLI and are developed in Go 🐿.

Each app’s front end is built with Qwik and uses Tailwind for styling. The server-side is powered by Qwik City (Qwik’s official meta-framework) and runs on Node.js hosted on a shared Linode VPS. The apps also use PM2 for process management and Caddy as a reverse proxy and SSL provisioner. The data is stored in a PostgreSQL database that also runs on a shared Linode VPS. The apps interact with the database using Drizzle, an Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) for JavaScript. The entire infrastructure for both apps is managed with Terraform using the Terraform Linode provider, which was new to me, but made provisioning and destroying infrastructure really fast and easy (once I learned how it all worked).

For example, integrating Terraform for infrastructure as code (IaC) into the IDP can streamline updates and rollbacks.

In this project, you will understand and get hands on experience around the entire concept around CI/CD from applications perspective. To fully gain real expertise around this idea, it is best to see it in action across different programming languages and from the platform perspective too. From the application perspective, we will be focusing on PHP here; there are more projects ahead that are based on Java, Node.js, .Net and Python. By the time you start working on Terraform, Docker and Kubernetes projects, you will get to see the platform perspective of CI/CD in action.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is an important part of any true hosting operation in the public cloud. Each of these platforms has their own IaC solution, e.g. AWS CloudFormation. But they also support popular open-source IaC tools like Pulumi or Terraform. A category of tools that also needs to be discussed is API gateways and other app-specific load balancers. There are applications for internal consumption, which can be called microservices if you have a lot of them. And often microservices use advanced networking options such as a service mesh instead of just the native private network offered by a VPC.