terraform-provider-github
goldmark-highlighting
| terraform-provider-github | goldmark-highlighting | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 1 | |
| 926 | 103 | |
| 1.5% | - | |
| 8.8 | 3.0 | |
| 5 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
terraform-provider-github
-
Github provider
There's an open feature request issue for it in the provider. I'd keep your eyes on 1534 for it to be implemented, as well as give it the 'ol thumbs-up bump.
- Is Github Actions really production ready for large corporation ?
-
The strongest principle of the blog's growth lies in the human choice to deploy it
I wanted to configure GitHub Pages using terraform because this project already uses it to configure this repository. But currently, due to how GitHub provider for terraform is written, configuring Pages requires some fiddling and will not work on the first run. During my research into how I could achieve declarative configuration for Pages, I found out that GitHub recently added actions that allow deploying to Pages without additional branch. I like this new approach better and in the future I will switch to it, but for now I decided to configure Pages manually as suggested by GitHub Pages Action that we are using.
-
Error: Failed to install provider
Someone hit the wrong switch at the factory: https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/releases/tag/v4.28.0
-
Show HN: GitHub as Code – Manage GitHub with Terraform
Well, there are a lot of open issues [0] with no outlook to get them ever closed.
We've had issues with branch protection rules (the same code works with old actors in the state, but new actors erroring out without any reason), organization secrets, etc.
[0]: https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/is...
-
Configurable GitHub default merge action: merge, squash, rebase
https://github.com/integrations/terraform-provider-github/is...
I don't understand how this hasn't gotten more attention throughout the years. I would like to learn about why that is.
I am a big fan of Squash and Merge but it's saddening that users have to configure that by hand on a repo when they first merge a commit via the GitHub UI, as many people aren't aware or don't think about it which can lead to nasty commit histories.
Am I missing something? Am I git'ing wrong?
- How do you manage many repositories?
goldmark-highlighting
-
The strongest principle of the blog's growth lies in the human choice to deploy it
Hugo -> goldmark -> goldmark-highlighting -> chroma
What are some alternatives?
git-xargs - git-xargs is a command-line tool (CLI) for making updates across multiple Github repositories with a single command.
blog - Personal blog
actions-hugo - GitHub Actions for Hugo ⚡️ Setup Hugo quickly and build your site fast. Hugo extended, Hugo Modules, Linux (Ubuntu), macOS, and Windows are supported.
gita - Manage many git repos with sanity 从容管理多个git库
cache - Cache dependencies and build outputs in GitHub Actions
infrastructure - terragrunt infrastructure configuration
chroma - A general purpose syntax highlighter in pure Go
Hugo - The world’s fastest framework for building websites.
terraform-github-repository - A Terraform module to manage GitHub Repositories. https://github.com/
pages-gem - A simple Ruby Gem to bootstrap dependencies for setting up and maintaining a local Jekyll environment in sync with GitHub Pages