terraform-provider-argocd VS terraform-provider-google

Compare terraform-provider-argocd vs terraform-provider-google and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
terraform-provider-argocd terraform-provider-google
2 16
361 2,224
1.1% 0.8%
7.3 9.9
8 days ago 3 days ago
Go Go
Mozilla Public License 2.0 Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

terraform-provider-argocd

Posts with mentions or reviews of terraform-provider-argocd. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-03.
  • Is using an argocd provider for terraform an anti-pattern? Why not just use helm provider?
    2 projects | /r/devops | 3 Mar 2022
    I'm looking at projects like https://github.com/oboukili/terraform-provider-argocd and wondering if using this project would be an anti-pattern? For context I have a repo hosted with DigitalOcean that looks like atlantis provisioning terraform code folder -> atlantis code -> argocd -> pritunl. I'm thinking I want my initial terraform code to provision atlantis, then have atlantis provision an argocd server, then have argocd provision a custom pritunl helm chart. Just wondering if I should use Terraform to manage the argocd provisioning aspect of it or not and if it makes sense?
  • How to allow dynamic Terraform Provider Configuration
    3 projects | dev.to | 11 May 2021
    I'll use the example of the Argo CD provider. In a single Terraform run, we would like to:

terraform-provider-google

Posts with mentions or reviews of terraform-provider-google. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-02.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing terraform-provider-argocd and terraform-provider-google you can also consider the following projects:

terraform-kubernetes-manifests - Terraform modules for managing Kubernetes manifests

terraform-provider-netlify - Terraform Netlify provider. Please note: This Terraform provider is archived per our provider archiving process: https://terraform.io/docs/internals/archiving.html

devops-stack - 🌊 An all-in-one Kubernetes ☸ stack using Argo CD 🐙 and Terraform as base components

terraform-provider-grafana - Terraform Grafana provider

terraform-provider-aws - Terraform AWS provider [Moved to: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws]

terraform-provider-rancher2 - Terraform Rancher2 provider

terraform - Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.

terraform-provider-solana - Data source provider for Terraform that interacts with the Solana networks

terraform-provider-unifi - Terraform provider for Unifi :satellite:

helmfile - Deploy Kubernetes Helm Charts

terraform-example-foundation - Shows how the CFT modules can be composed to build a secure cloud foundation

Fail2Ban - Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors