synthetix VS stalin-sort

For this new contract I've chosen to use the logic of Synthetix's StakingRewards for ERC20 staking which allows the distribution of a fixed amount of ERC20 tokens in a fixed period, with dynamic APRs that depend on how many ERC721 tokens are staked in the contract at each given point in time.

Yea. I wonder if buying a tokenised synthetic stock then would be the same eg: https://synthetix.io/

Visit https://synthetix.io then click on Staking takes you to

Synthetix has been running a bucket shop for a long time. They added stocks through Kwenta but got spooked and removed them.

https://synthetix.io/

Docs for Synthetix is unfortunately the code repo itself, starting with interface here

Looking through the Etherscan transactions for Serum and Jump Trading, I came across a new name - Synthetix.

I came across a new name from this list- Synthetix (website link)

Derivatives Marketplace - it could be something like what https://aperture.finance/ and https://www.mirror.finance/ had built before on the TERRA chain (currently on AVAX and coming soon to SOL) where you can buy STOCK DERIVATIVES or something like what https://synthetix.io/ does.

you guys are not up to date, check out synthetix.io, a lot of synthetics exist on the blockchain with pegged tokens. Obviously a true GME token backed by GME can exist and will be your tokens but it won't stop people from trading GME pegged tokens in a synthetic manner preventing price discovery

SNX, the token staked in the Synthetix system to produce synthetic assets;

Have you heard of our lord and saviour, Stalin sort?

Don't forget Stalin Sort!

I'm sure there's some practical application for StalinSort, but that doesn't mean I'm going to start considering StalinSort for all of my sorting needs.

View on GitHub

This was just mentioned in another post Stalin Sort Repo

Always opt for Stalin Sort in these cases. If the Prof objects, running them through the algorithm quells any dissent reliably.