Obsidian
purescript
Our great sponsors
| Obsidian | purescript | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | |
| 40 | 8,458 | |
| - | 0.5% | |
| 0.0 | 6.6 | |
| almost 6 years ago | 13 days ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Obsidian
-
Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.
purescript
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
I will die on this hill (curve)
*cough* I mean Purescript.
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
What are some alternatives?
copilot - A stream-based runtime-verification framework for generating hard real-time C code.
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
really-simple-xml-parser - A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format
elm-reactor
resin - Resin: high performance variable binder and ast manipulation lib
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
hfmt - Format Haskell programs. Inspired by the gofmt utility.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
bash
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types