subspace VS wireguard-go-docker

When I look into vpn servers, I find easy installers, which directly work on linux (e.g. angristan/wireguard-install) or also vpns, which operate from docker (like kylemanna/docker-openvpn). Then there are options, where multiple things are included, like firezone or this. I am not so sure how well they integrate with my reverse proxy and some seem to be much more complicated than others.

https://github.com/subspacecloud/subspace (2.2k GitHub stars, last updated February 9th)

Subspace

That is nice to see, I was looking at subspace last week and the last commit to https://github.com/subspacecloud/subspace had led me to believe it had withered and died, I was guessing due to the primary backing company having died?

So it is quite nice to see that it is living on as a fork.

Another UI-enabled alternative for WireGuard is Subspace. And another simple-as-hell option for managing VPN profiles (with OpenVPN and WG compatibility, but no web interface) could be running PiVPN on any Ubuntu/Debian host.

Have you checked https://github.com/subspacecloud/subspace ?

I thought wireguard-go requires the kernel tun device. See for example this Docker image for wireguard-go which maps the tun device and requires elevated permissions - https://github.com/masipcat/wireguard-go-docker

I was just curious if it's just me. It seems theres a few posts on various places on the internet on this and the questions are not answered on any of them (EG: https://github.com/masipcat/wireguard-go-docker/issues/19)