starport VS gaia

Starport: Github • Telegram • Discord

One of the great things about the Cosmos Ecosystem is the sheer amount of modules available for integration. Moreover, tools like Starport make it super simple to create a new chain. We've also benefited immensely from the work of the Confio team on the CosmWasm module. Thanks to all these community efforts, Juno is fully working today.

Starport - Cosmos: The Internet of Blockchains

https://github.com/tendermint/starport#quick-start

Hello, I’m trying to build a blockchain using startport, I have watched this video https://youtu.be/DhciTJHxvAY but I haven’t understood how the "system works" since in the docs https://github.com/tendermint/starport/tree/develop/docs it’s not discussed the "network create chain" command, and I thought the new chain already started after "starport serve"

Starport would be the way https://github.com/tendermint/starport

Come join our discord! link here: https://cosmos.network/

Cosmos Hub Validators can get up to speed with the upgrade process : HERE

Follow the development: HERE

https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/branches/active

You for example go to the official source repository of cosmos, which is https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/releases, and get the official CLI client. You can use that to create a AUTHZ transaction which you sign on your ledger. It’s the same transaction you can sign with yieldmos or RestakeApp and Keplr as soon as the UI is updated. It’s just a limitation in the UI that we need to use the CLI for now. You never enter your seed in the CLI if you use a ledger.

If you’re talking specifically about the “Composable Parachain”, the Cosmos equivalent is Interchain Security which is set to launch imminently https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/blob/main/docs/interchain-security.md

Cosmos is actually one of the harder chains to validate because of its heavier system requirements (https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/issues/704), and since it doesn't enforce any minimum commission rates, so validators are pushed to offer lower (even negative!) rates to attract delegations to stand out in this relatively large 175 active set.

for over six months I have been reporting that there are issues with interchain foundation delegations on the cosmos hub. Trying to report this has led to retaliation-- the first person I reported this to was Billy, and he attempted to use the contributors covenant (contributorcovenant.org) to remove me from cosmos during proposal 69. He said I tweeted too much. To the best of my knowledge I'm the sole validator trying (https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/pulls) to make code contributions to the hub.

I recommend reading the Interchain Security Litepaper for more info on V1-3, and the rationale behind some design decisions.

Cosmos Hub Bloat: Fat Gaia by Jacob Gadikian, Notional Validator The main bloat here comes from future dapps that have been approved by governance. The extra load on the Hub would increase the RAM usage, upkeep cost, and system requirements for validators Could possibly increase barrier to entry for new/independent validators

I learned about what I said in #3 from a short discussion with one of the devs. More generally, here's the interchain security litepaper.