sso-wall-of-shame
apprunner-roadmap
sso-wall-of-shame | apprunner-roadmap | |
---|---|---|
201 | 62 | |
584 | 286 | |
- | 0.0% | |
8.3 | 0.0 | |
17 days ago | almost 3 years ago | |
JavaScript | ||
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sso-wall-of-shame
-
Tailscale SSH is now Generally Available
Hi! Tailscalar here. This is very topical for me! Over the past 3 weeks I've been working with internal stakeholders to remove our SSO tax - the sso tax is a pet hate of mine. A couple of weeks ago we removed it from our pricing plan after my proposal was approved, and today I released a blog on our website to announce it more widely: https://tailscale.com/blog/sso-tax-cut
I knew of https://sso.tax (which we are not listed on but I did include in my blog), but didn't know there was another website too!
-
Software Company HashiCorp Is Weighing a Potential Sale
I'm not the person you've asked, but I'm somebody who has been purchasing SaaS/software for businesses large and small for years. My take:
1. If SSO and other basic modern security features are locked into "Enterprise" pricing tiers then the service is at the bottom of the list (see: https://sso.tax). I'd love to say instant disqualification but too many SaaS companies have it in their head that only wealthy enterprises use SSO, despite SSO platforms being widely available and some quite cheap to acquire and start using.
2. If I need to request a quote to start any kind of service to see what the product is about then I'm not likely to pursue it. Don't make me jump through hoops when I'm just trying to see if a product can fit my needs.
3. If license terms are too complex or easy to violate that's a hard pass. Infrastructure monitoring tools are a great example. The licensing is often per "device" or per monitored metric, and some vendors are very loose with their definition of "device". (Don't use LogicMonitor with k8s unless you like throwing money in the garbage can). Hard lessons learned.
4. If the only details I can find regarding how you secure your product are claims of SOC2 and ISO27001 certification then that's a very likely pass. Those controls are great to have, necessary even, but anyone who has had to work to meet those compliance objectives knows that they're much more about organization controls than they are product security. Give me an idea about how you protect data and whatnot on a security page somewhere, not an attestation that dev and prod are separate and you have logs.
On the side of the positives, outside of not hitting the negative marks, I value ease to work with, responsive and competent support, strong pre and post-sales solutions architecture and support/training (if the product is complex enough to warrant that), and supports SSO. I bring up SSO again because it's a hard requirement for SaaS purchases everywhere I go -- no SSO, no go. Social login is not a substitute and is highly undesired.
Hope this helps.
-
Multi – Multiplayer Collaboration for macOS
Don’t be shy, here’s the link: https://github.com/robchahin/sso-wall-of-shame/issues.
- SSO Tax- SaaS companies basis of upgrading from standard to enterprise
- SSO everything, good Idea?
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
It sounds like you're unaware of why SSO is considered a security feature at all them, but it's covered right on the site: https://sso.tax/
It's to allow centralized access management. Stuff like firing someone and revoking their access from one platform instantly, instead running around and changing permissions in every tool manually. Or ensuring people in department A can't be invited to some platform for people in department B in order to limit information access.
SSO tax is predicated on the idea that the moment you outgrow the informal arrangements and liberal access, you're really a business. Seems pretty fair?
-
eSignature for Google Docs and Google Drive (Beta)
Last time I had to implement Okta integration for DocuSign at my employer it was absurdly expensive. If Google does this right then I’d be ever so happy.
DocuSign on the SSO Tax site: https://sso.tax/
-
Show HN: Infisical – open-source secret management platform
There’s a strong, widespread objection to hiding security features behind a paywall: https://sso.tax/
If 2fa is the only way you can differentiate in order to force enterprises to pay, it’s better to have a fee for security than to die because you can’t make money… but broadly, as a security company, you should aim for maximum security for every user.
-
Keygen: a software licensing and distribution API
I totally understand. I'm aware of the SSO tax. It's just honestly a complex feature, with a significant maintenance and support burden, and I leaned making it EE so that it'd be worth all the effort to implement and maintain (i.e. I want it to be a new-positive feature for revenue). But if I could get help from other contributors, I'd be fine with SSO being a CE feature too.
-
Managed Services Client Onboarding: Simple Process (Free Template)
Need to put them up for the SSO Wall of shame. https://sso.tax/
apprunner-roadmap
- AWS AppRunner doesn't support WebSockets
-
The 2024 Web Hosting Report
Examples for products in this category are: Google Cloud Run, AWS App Runner, Azure Container Apps. Each has different scalability, cost, and integration trade-offs.
- AWS App Runner access logs
-
Rant: does anyone use AWS App Runner in production?
The deployment failed, and there were no logs available to help me debug the issue. There's an open issue on GitHub that has been around for over a year, but there doesn't seem to be a solution in sight.
-
Best Practices in AWS - ELB + Ingress?
If you're looking for something simple, that you can onboard to relatively quickly, that doesn't require a lot of oversight, consider App Runner, https://aws.amazon.com/apprunner/. EKS and Kubernetes are extremely powerful and flexible, but they come a fair amount of complexity. If you don't care about the orchestrator (or running your application in another cloud), try App Runner.
-
Security on AWS - AWS WAF x AWS App Runner
The reader will learn how to create a web application firewall with AWS WAF and AWS App Runner as a web application. AWS App Runner is an AWS service that deploys web applications or API using Amazon ECR or GitHub only. While AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) is an AWS service that can protect the web application.
-
Getting started with ECS can be overwhelming. It involves working with multiple services and concepts like ECR, Fargate, Task Definitions, Clusters etc. Let's see a step by step tutorial which touches upon these concepts, builds a simple task and gets it deployed on ECS.
Yes, exactly. That's the problem. I found the issue here.
-
Be careful what you test or deploy to Vercel
I wonder what the aversion is to using a plain old server / vps. It's really not that difficult to deploy nowadays [0][1][2][3] and I'd rather get an $8 bill every month as insurance than ever worry about shit like OP just went through. It'll probably be more performant anyway due to cold starts and "edge" still having to hit us-east-1 for data.. cache your static files with Cloud Flare/Front. People are always surprised by how much traffic a single VPS can take[4] and believe it all has to be serverless to be web scale. I believe HN still runs on a single core or something.
There's a ton of places to get cloud credits as well, too many to link, so just Bing™ it
[0] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/api/v2/docs/aws-cdk-lib.aws_...
[1] https://aws.amazon.com/apprunner/
[2] https://cloud.google.com/run
[3] https://render.com/
[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34676186
-
Does aws offer something like this?
AWS AppRunner could do more or less everything. You'd have to build a container image yourself, since AppRunner does not have C++ support for the "Code-based" service, but building a container really isn't more complex than installing that bare metal server. (Really, pick an OS, install dependencies, copy your code, start a service. That is all.)
-
How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
App Runner
What are some alternatives?
vaultwarden - Unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs
LocalStack - 💻 A fully functional local AWS cloud stack. Develop and test your cloud & Serverless apps offline
unleash - Open-source feature management solution built for developers.
aws-app-runner - Repository for the blog post "Deploying a globally distributed API with AWS App Runner and Fauna"
ToolJet - Low-code platform for building business applications. Connect to databases, cloud storages, GraphQL, API endpoints, Airtable, Google sheets, OpenAI, etc and build apps using drag and drop application builder. Built using JavaScript/TypeScript. 🚀
Express - Fast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for node.
cerbos - Cerbos is the open core, language-agnostic, scalable authorization solution that makes user permissions and authorization simple to implement and manage by writing context-aware access control policies for your application resources.
copilot-cli - The AWS Copilot CLI is a tool for developers to build, release and operate production ready containerized applications on AWS App Runner or Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate.
infisical - ♾ Infisical is the open-source secret management platform: Sync secrets across your team/infrastructure and prevent secret leaks.
sst-start-demo - A simple SST app to demo the new `sst start` command
budibase - Budibase is an open-source low code platform that helps you build internal tools in minutes 🚀
faunadb-js - Javascript driver for FaunaDB v4