ssh-mitm VS Metasploit

SSH MITM - Intercept SSH connections with a proxy; all plaintext passwords and sessions are logged to disk.

Hello,

at my university, we are learning, how to use ssh for server administration.

We learned, that ssh is secure, but there are some tools, which allows man in the middle attacks on ssh.

I found following tools:

* https://github.com/jtesta/ssh-mitm - most starred, but uses an outdated OpenSSH version and it's complicated to setup :-(

Metasploit

Metasploit: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework

1-) Learn Hacking on a debian based distro like Kali Linux - I personally started with tools like nikto, camhacker... and then moved to more complex frameworks like metasploit.

I once had to give a presentation about Metasploit, and whether it was ethically correct for the creator to make it free and open-source, available to everyone. And in researching this I realized that there were a lot of parallels between the arguments for or against hacking tools being readily available and the arguments for or against gun control. I'll just list a few quickly:

Metasploit Framework (mentioned earlier)

This phase is where the pen testers practically prove that there exist potential vulnerabilities in the target system. The pen testers do the hacking using an array of technical approaches and social engineering methods to exploit the vulnerabilities. The ethical hackers commonly use Metasploit framework to automatically execute exploitation against the target systems. Moreover, they may install malwares such as rootkit to persistently maintain their foothold and further compromise the target system.