splat
MobX
splat | MobX | |
---|---|---|
16 | 45 | |
966 | 27,211 | |
0.1% | 0.2% | |
8.8 | 8.0 | |
7 days ago | 4 days ago | |
C# | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
splat
-
Using MVVM in Flutter (2022)
This is a simple Service Locator for Dart and Flutter projects with some additional goodies highly inspired by Splat. It can be used instead of InheritedWidget or Provider to access objects e.g. from your UI.
-
Detailed thoughts on the State of the .NET Foundation · Discussion #60 · dotnet-foundation/Home
I read through the PR discussion in question as part of reading Rob Mensching's post before I came across this discussion, and thought that she'd overstepped. However, after watching Tim Corey go through the same discussion, I realise that not only did she overstep, she appeared to actively (and publicly) fight with the current maintainer. Her actions appear (to me) to be completely arrogant, selfish, uncaring, and frankly dangerous to the project.
-
Microsoft locks .NET hot reload capabilities behind Visual Studio 2022
Head of .NET Foundation creates and merges a PR for a change they made to a project where they hadn't been active for several years. When confronted by current maintainers, their response was at the very least, hostile and poorly thought out.
-
How the .NET Foundation kerfuffle became a brouhaha
Many projects joined the .NET Foundation after it was created. It didn't really do anything, but it wasn't harming anyone either.
The .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (for their CLA bot). The author declined and a workaround was organized.
Years later the .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (to allow them enforce Code of Conduct across all repositories. The author declined.
The CLA bot stopped working. The author was told it would work if he gave it owner access. The author was annoyed because they previously had a workaround. They gave in and gave @dnfadmin owner access.
The author woke up and realized that the project had now been silently moved to GitHub Enterprise. The author states that projects in GitHub Enterprise can be entirely controlled by the owner of the account (the .NET Foundation). This transfer happened silently.
Independently, this happened to another project (who had coincidentally had an issue with a Microsoft employee and former contributor force a pull-request into their project: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778).
People are upset because of how tone-deaf all of this is. They would like the .NET Foundation to stop trying to gain complete control over the member projects. They would like Microsoft employees to not force pull requests into their projects.
-
I'm Sorry
> I am not versed in all the details here
You should probably read the conversation in the PR: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778
> there is a dire need for professional communications training among these programmers.
Maybe, but probably not why you think.
Once you've read the PR's conversation you'll see this isn't about someone just merging a PR which wasn't approved. This about someone submitting a PR, a maintainer asking for discussion before merging it, ignoring the maintainer and just merge the PR, the maintainer asking why it wasn't discussed and then making a snide remark to the maintainer.
So I agree that the "Sorry for merging a PR" isn't going to cut it here. The merging of the PR was the least of the problem. It's a hollow corporate-style apology where someone is allowed to be called out for. It's like saying: "Sorry I hurt your toe" after you pushed someone of a cliff.
- .NET Foundation problems and solutions
-
Most popular Flutter libraries for state management in 2021
Library inspired by Splat from the React world again. Library is not so popular like previous and maintenance is also a little lower.
MobX
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
States can also be organized in some central places (aka. stores). You can use Tini Store (very simple, ~50 lines) or other state management solutions such as MobX, TinyX, ...
-
Episode 24/13: Native Signals, Details on Angular/Wiz, Alan Agius on the Angular CLI
Similarly to Promises/A+, this effort focuses on aligning the JavaScript ecosystem. If this alignment is successful, then a standard could emerge, based on that experience. Several framework authors are collaborating here on a common model which could back their reactivity core. The current draft is based on design input from the authors/maintainers of Angular, Bubble, Ember, FAST, MobX, Preact, Qwik, RxJS, Solid, Starbeam, Svelte, Vue, Wiz, and more…
- 5 Alternatives to Redux for React State Management
-
Redux 101
MobX
-
React State Management in 2024
Mutable-based: leverages proxy to create mutable data sources which can be directly written to or reactively read from. Candidates in this group are MobX and Valtio.
-
Show HN: Cami.js – A No Build, Web Component Based Reactive Framework
Looks good! FWIW I always felt the observable pattern much more intuitive than the redux/reducer style. Something like https://mobx.js.org/
Things get hairy in both, but redux pattern feels so ridiculously ceremonially to effectively manage a huge global state object with a false sense of "purity".
Observables otoh say "fuck it, I'm mutating everything, do what you want with it".
-
State Management Alternatives: Best Tools for React Apps
MobX Documentation
-
React native for Linux app development in 2023
There's also others libraries like https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx which aren't specific to RN but can be used in any JS environment.
-
Is redux and thunks still used or are there other alternatives for it now?
Valtio is like simplified MobX
-
What is React State Management?
Link: https://mobx.js.org
What are some alternatives?
azure-cli - Azure Command-Line Interface
zustand - 🐻 Bear necessities for state management in React
node - Node.js JavaScript runtime ✨🐢🚀✨
RxJS - A reactive programming library for JavaScript
Analogy.LogViewer - A customizable Log Viewer with ability to create custom providers. Can be used with C#, C++, Python, Java and others
Recoil - Recoil is an experimental state management library for React apps. It provides several capabilities that are difficult to achieve with React alone, while being compatible with the newest features of React.
Home - This is the landing repository for the .NET foundation efforts. Start here!
riverpod - A reactive caching and data-binding framework. Riverpod makes working with asynchronous code a breeze.
valtio - 💊 Valtio makes proxy-state simple for React and Vanilla
flutter_getx_timetracker - Timetracker created with Flutter and GetX framework
Cycle.js - A functional and reactive JavaScript framework for predictable code