splat
core
splat | core | |
---|---|---|
16 | 106 | |
966 | 20,572 | |
0.1% | 0.3% | |
8.8 | 9.2 | |
7 days ago | about 7 hours ago | |
C# | PowerShell | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
splat
-
Using MVVM in Flutter (2022)
This is a simple Service Locator for Dart and Flutter projects with some additional goodies highly inspired by Splat. It can be used instead of InheritedWidget or Provider to access objects e.g. from your UI.
-
Detailed thoughts on the State of the .NET Foundation · Discussion #60 · dotnet-foundation/Home
I read through the PR discussion in question as part of reading Rob Mensching's post before I came across this discussion, and thought that she'd overstepped. However, after watching Tim Corey go through the same discussion, I realise that not only did she overstep, she appeared to actively (and publicly) fight with the current maintainer. Her actions appear (to me) to be completely arrogant, selfish, uncaring, and frankly dangerous to the project.
-
Microsoft locks .NET hot reload capabilities behind Visual Studio 2022
Head of .NET Foundation creates and merges a PR for a change they made to a project where they hadn't been active for several years. When confronted by current maintainers, their response was at the very least, hostile and poorly thought out.
-
How the .NET Foundation kerfuffle became a brouhaha
Many projects joined the .NET Foundation after it was created. It didn't really do anything, but it wasn't harming anyone either.
The .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (for their CLA bot). The author declined and a workaround was organized.
Years later the .NET Foundation asked for owner access on a repository (to allow them enforce Code of Conduct across all repositories. The author declined.
The CLA bot stopped working. The author was told it would work if he gave it owner access. The author was annoyed because they previously had a workaround. They gave in and gave @dnfadmin owner access.
The author woke up and realized that the project had now been silently moved to GitHub Enterprise. The author states that projects in GitHub Enterprise can be entirely controlled by the owner of the account (the .NET Foundation). This transfer happened silently.
Independently, this happened to another project (who had coincidentally had an issue with a Microsoft employee and former contributor force a pull-request into their project: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778).
People are upset because of how tone-deaf all of this is. They would like the .NET Foundation to stop trying to gain complete control over the member projects. They would like Microsoft employees to not force pull requests into their projects.
-
I'm Sorry
> I am not versed in all the details here
You should probably read the conversation in the PR: https://github.com/reactiveui/splat/pull/778
> there is a dire need for professional communications training among these programmers.
Maybe, but probably not why you think.
Once you've read the PR's conversation you'll see this isn't about someone just merging a PR which wasn't approved. This about someone submitting a PR, a maintainer asking for discussion before merging it, ignoring the maintainer and just merge the PR, the maintainer asking why it wasn't discussed and then making a snide remark to the maintainer.
So I agree that the "Sorry for merging a PR" isn't going to cut it here. The merging of the PR was the least of the problem. It's a hollow corporate-style apology where someone is allowed to be called out for. It's like saying: "Sorry I hurt your toe" after you pushed someone of a cliff.
- .NET Foundation problems and solutions
-
Most popular Flutter libraries for state management in 2021
Library inspired by Splat from the React world again. Library is not so popular like previous and maintenance is also a little lower.
core
-
.NET Monthly Roundup - March 2024 - .NET 9 Preview 2, Smart Components, AI fun, and more!
🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire
-
Locally test and validate your Renovate configuration files
DEBUG: packageFiles with updates (repository=local) "config": { "nuget": [ { "deps": [ { "datasource": "nuget", "depType": "nuget", "depName": "Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting", "currentValue": "7.0.0", "updates": [ { "bucket": "non-major", "newVersion": "7.0.1", "newValue": "7.0.1", "releaseTimestamp": "2023-02-14T13:21:52.713Z", "newMajor": 7, "newMinor": 0, "updateType": "patch", "branchName": "renovate/dotnet-monorepo" }, { "bucket": "major", "newVersion": "8.0.0", "newValue": "8.0.0", "releaseTimestamp": "2023-11-14T13:23:17.653Z", "newMajor": 8, "newMinor": 0, "updateType": "major", "branchName": "renovate/major-dotnet-monorepo" } ], "packageName": "Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting", "versioning": "nuget", "warnings": [], "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/dotnet/runtime", "registryUrl": "https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json", "homepage": "https://dot.net/", "currentVersion": "7.0.0", "isSingleVersion": true, "fixedVersion": "7.0.0" } ], "packageFile": "RenovateDemo.csproj" } ] }
- The full API diff between .NET 7 and .NET 8
-
Why isn’t dotnet core popular among startups?
The tooling is not entirely open or freely available.
If you, for e.g., want to debug you have to use MS tooling.[0] You also can't use VSCodium because only the MS built/distributed version of VSCode contains the necessary proprietary binary blobs necessary to debug C# (which also means you're forced to using the aggressive telemetry and other data collection built into the non-open source distribution of VSCode).
They've also taken steps to lock down the LSP support for C#, which once again requires that you use a MS sanctioned code editor to write C#. [1]
I really enjoy writing C# and think dotnet is a great platform to develop for, but the barriers preventing me from building more projects on it is that I don't want to be forced to use VSCode or Visual Studio.
[0] https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/505
-
New 64-bit game client
Microsoft does not adapt their new products to operating systems (https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/7556) which have reached End-of-Support status. Therefore, the game's system requirements have changed:
-
//////. How can you use the finder outer to recover lost crypto? ///
Thanks to .Net core
- Consulta Git Exclude Files
- The Primeagen has thoughts on the RF’s licensing proposal
- Announcing BitcoinCashClient - A NuGet library for easy integration of BCH into any C# .NET application
What are some alternatives?
azure-cli - Azure Command-Line Interface
homebridge - HomeKit support for the impatient.
node - Node.js JavaScript runtime ✨🐢🚀✨
CompreFace - Leading free and open-source face recognition system
Analogy.LogViewer - A customizable Log Viewer with ability to create custom providers. Can be used with C#, C++, Python, Java and others
double-take - Unified UI and API for processing and training images for facial recognition.
Home - This is the landing repository for the .NET foundation efforts. Start here!
Mycodo - An environmental monitoring and regulation system
riverpod - A reactive caching and data-binding framework. Riverpod makes working with asynchronous code a breeze.
Jellyfin - The Free Software Media System
flutter_getx_timetracker - Timetracker created with Flutter and GetX framework
Domoticz - Open source Home Automation System