spdk VS shellcheck-repl

Compare spdk vs shellcheck-repl and see what are their differences.

spdk

Storage Performance Development Kit (by spdk)

shellcheck-repl

Validation of Shell Commands Before Evaluation (by HenrikBengtsson)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
spdk shellcheck-repl
6 4
2,829 15
2.3% -
9.9 3.1
3 days ago 4 months ago
C Shell
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later ISC License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

spdk

Posts with mentions or reviews of spdk. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-06.
  • calcuating IOPS
    2 projects | /r/sysadmin | 6 May 2023
    https://spdk.io will require you to load linux onto the server (livecd off a usb should be fine), but is essentially the most efficient way possible to do IO. Intel’s storage division used to use it to get the numbers they advertised with. When they loaded up a system with kioxia drives, Intel managed to hit 120 million IOPS in some of their testing.
  • Storage performance development kit
    1 project | /r/github_trends | 16 Jun 2022
  • Win32 is the stable Linux userland ABI
    1 project | /r/programmingcirclejerk | 1 Mar 2022
  • SPDK: Storage Performance Development Kit
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Apr 2021
  • ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Mar 2021
    Since the project I work on (https://spdk.io) largely produces a set of executables as output, it was most natural to write the tests in bash. There's one top level bash script that kicks off the full suite of tests and thousands and thousands of lines of tests all written as bash scripts stringing together calls to these executables.

    One of these tests is to run shellcheck against all of the scripts in the repo. We don't allow any modifications to scripts without shellcheck giving them the green light now. The quality of our tests has increased dramatically since this was instituted - it's a really great tool.

  • Achieving 11M IOPS and 66 GB/S IO on a Single ThreadRipper Workstation
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Jan 2021
    FYI SPDK doesn't strictly require the IOMMU be enabled. See https://spdk.io/doc/system_configuration.html There's also a new experimental interrupt mode (not for everything) finding some valuable use cases in SPDK, see https://github.com/spdk/spdk/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md and feel free to jump on the SPDK slack channel or email list for more info on either of these https://spdk.io/community/

shellcheck-repl

Posts with mentions or reviews of shellcheck-repl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-27.
  • Shell Script Best Practices, from a decade of scripting things
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Oct 2022
    > "Use shellcheck."

    (Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)

    After falling in love with ShellCheck several years ago, with the help of another person, I made the ShellCheck REPL tool for Bash:

      https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl>
  • Bash Pitfalls
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Feb 2022
    Thank you, and thanks for the suggestion. Yes, it should be possible to keep the SC2154 check. I probably just disabled it as a quick fix when first started out. I'm tracking this in https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl/issues/15.

    > You'd also want to take into account special variables like $RANDOM and $HOSTNAME, but that's pretty trivial.

    It seems like ShellCheck is already aware of these special Bash variable, e.g. 'echo $RANDOM' will not trigger SC2154 (or even SC2086 that otherwise asks you to quote variables).

  • ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Mar 2021
    shellcheck-repl: Validation of Shell Commands Before Evaluation

    https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl

    This tool validates your commands at the Bash prompt using ShellCheck and refuses to evaluate them if there's a mistake. It ignores a set of rules that doesn't play well with oneliners.

    (Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing spdk and shellcheck-repl you can also consider the following projects:

KVell - KVell: the Design and Implementation of a Fast Persistent Key-Value Store

shellharden - The corrective bash syntax highlighter

bats-core - Bash Automated Testing System

chia-blockchain - Chia blockchain python implementation (full node, farmer, harvester, timelord, and wallet)

pure-bash-bible - 📖 A collection of pure bash alternatives to external processes.

static-analysis - ⚙️ A curated list of static analysis (SAST) tools and linters for all programming languages, config files, build tools, and more. The focus is on tools which improve code quality.

ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts

hadolint - Dockerfile linter, validate inline bash, written in Haskell

isort - A Python utility / library to sort imports.

shunit2 - shUnit2 is a xUnit based unit test framework for Bourne based shell scripts.

dmenu-scripts - Serious fun with dmenu