sourcelink
runner
Our great sponsors
sourcelink | runner | |
---|---|---|
7 | 59 | |
1,224 | 4,498 | |
1.5% | 2.6% | |
9.0 | 9.1 | |
7 days ago | 3 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sourcelink
-
Refix: Fast, Debuggable, Reproducible Builds
The premise of the tool seems very useful: edit debug symbols and assert messages so that source code can be found by debuggers. But this description does not make it clear how this tool accomplishes the whole task:
> Why not fix the binary coming out of the build cache, so it points to the absolute path of the source files?
What is the absolute path? If you had a virtual file system that allowed you to construct a path to any file at a given commit, this would work great. But who does that other than Google? Or if you agree that every developer will check out the same source code repo at the same path, but the you have to have the right commit checked out.
Ideally you would want your binary to point back to your code repo, like SourceLink does.
https://github.com/dotnet/sourcelink
- Visual Studio users, are there any debugging features from Rider or other IDE that you miss while using VS2022?
-
How do I include selected files from a remote repository?
Reference https://github.com/dotnet/sourcelink/tree/main/src/Microsoft.Build.Tasks.Git
-
I wrote a tiny source generator to reliably get a build timestamp, without breaking deterministic builds!
The tooling isn't quite there yet, but between SourceLink and EmbedUntrackedSources, it should be completely reasonable to be able to maintain trust (and eventually, easy, exact reproducibility) for projects that use source generation. Plus, AFAIK, for a package to truly be considered deterministic, all of the sources used for the build either must be tracked by source control, or embedded with the aforementioned flag.
-
Feedback on open source library.
It looks like your NuGet packages is missing symbols (the .pdb files next to .dll files). Symbols let folks map from compiled code back to source code. No symbols make it harder for users to debug your package. I'd recommend using Source Link for your project: https://github.com/dotnet/sourcelink
- How to get nuget package debugging to work?
-
Lessons Learned: Migrating from AppVeyor to GitHub Actions
If you want to enable Source Link for the consumers of your NuGets, make sure you turn on deterministic builds using dotnet build /p:ContinuousIntegrationBuild=true.
runner
- 20-line PR to add key Docker feature to GitHub Actions, please upvote
-
Why the fuck are we templating YAML? (2019)
In the case of GitHub Actions, it's made more painful by the lack of support for YAML anchors, which provide a bare minimum of composability.
https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/1182
- please dont state this as a "workaround". your version simply "pretends" it is a tty when infact it is not an actual tty
-
PySide vs. .NET WinForms for a Desktop GUI App in 2023?
Even if you donβt pick Avalonia, their notes for Mac distribution look useful:
https://docs.avaloniaui.net/docs/distribution-publishing/mac...
For example, the GitHub actions runner itself is a modern .NET core project with CI except for .app packaging.
https://github.com/actions/runner/tree/main/.github/workflow...
-
GitHub Actions Are a Problem
This probably answers your question:
https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/a4c57f27477077e57545a...
-
DevOps CI/CD Quick Start Guide with GitHub Actions π οΈπβ‘οΈ
$ mkdir actions-runner && cd actions-runner $ curl -o actions-runner-osx-arm64-2.311.0.tar.gz -L https://github.com/actions/runner/releases/download/v2.311.0/actions-runner-osx-arm64-2.311.0.tar.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 100 98.1M 100 98.1M 0 0 20.0M 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 --:--:-- 23.5M $ echo "fa2f107dbce709807bae014fb3121f5dbe106211b6bbe3484c41e3b30828d6b2 actions-runner-osx-arm64-2.311.0.tar.gz" | shasum -a 256 -c actions-runner-osx-arm64-2.311.0.tar.gz: OK $ tar xzf ./actions-runner-osx-arm64-2.311.0.tar.gz β― ./config.sh --url https://github.com/dpills/devops-quick-start-guide --token AGDCRGCMZWN34QIVISIO5XXXXXX -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | | / ___(_) |_| | | |_ _| |__ / \ ___| |_(_) ___ _ __ ___ | | | | _| | __| |_| | | | | '_ \ / _ \ / __| __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __| | | | |_| | | |_| _ | |_| | |_) | / ___ \ (__| |_| | (_) | | | \__ \ | | \____|_|\__|_| |_|\__,_|_.__/ /_/ \_\___|\__|_|\___/|_| |_|___/ | | | | Self-hosted runner registration | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Authentication β Connected to GitHub # Runner Registration Enter the name of the runner group to add this runner to: [press Enter for Default] Enter the name of runner: [press Enter for dpills-mac] This runner will have the following labels: 'self-hosted', 'macOS', 'ARM64' Enter any additional labels (ex. label-1,label-2): [press Enter to skip] β Runner successfully added β Runner connection is good # Runner settings Enter name of work folder: [press Enter for _work] β Settings Saved. β― ./run.sh β Connected to GitHub Current runner version: '2.311.0' 2023-10-27 13:32:16Z: Listening for Jobs
-
Automate Flutter app delivery to AppCenter with GitHub Actions
A runner is where your action's jobs will be run. It can be a hosted virtual environment, or you can self-host a runner in your machine.
- GitHub Actions Frequently Failing
- Runners fail to set up job with tar -xzf error
-
How to deal with MSVC in DevOps
If i understand this writing correctly (https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/904), running Windows containers in a windows-latest GH Actions host is not possible. While using a self-hosted runner on a Windows server might be an option, this is not what I want since it is a package repo for a well-known open source project, think of the package repo part as a mini-Conan. I wouldn't know who would want to host that. In the best case we would stay with just GH Actions to keep everything confined in one space :)
What are some alternatives?
DNT - DNT (DotNetTools): Command line tools to manage .NET projects and solutions.
act - Run your GitHub Actions locally π
dnSpy
azure-pipelines-agent - Azure Pipelines Agent π
dnSpy - .NET debugger and assembly editor [Moved to: https://github.com/dnSpy/dnSpy]
virtual-environments - GitHub Actions runner images [Moved to: https://github.com/actions/runner-images]
sdk - Core functionality needed to create .NET Core projects, that is shared between Visual Studio and CLI
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
semver - Semantic Versioning Specification
mockoon - Mockoon is the easiest and quickest way to run mock APIs locally. No remote deployment, no account required, open source.
ds3os - Dark Souls - Open Server
docker-github-runner-linux - Repository for building a self hosted GitHub runner as a ubuntu linux container