smart
ripgrep
smart | ripgrep | |
---|---|---|
6 | 351 | |
94 | 45,409 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 9.3 | |
about 2 months ago | 11 days ago | |
JavaScript | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | The Unlicense |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
smart
-
Faster IndexOf for Substrings in .NET
You can of course browse the source on GitHub: https://github.com/smart-tool/smart/tree/master/source
The tarballs are just a feature of GitHub, not something they specifically release.
-
linear-time, constant-space, fast substring-searching
Or just use one the fast strstr implementations. The current leader is EPSM https://smart-tool.github.io/smart/
-
The Boyer-Moore Fast String Searching Algorithm
In the libc's not, indeed. They are still in the stoneage of string search.
But the fastest is currently EPSM, by S. Faro and O. M. Kulekci. See https://smart-tool.github.io/smart/
"Exact Packed String Matching" optimized for SIMD SSE4.2/AVX (x86_64 and aarch64). It performs stable and best on all sizes.
The site I linked to compares 199 fast string search algorithms, with the usual ones (BM, KMP, BMH) being pretty slow. EPSM outperforms all the others being mentioned here on these platforms. It's also the latest.
-
Made a search algorithm, send help.
At the moment the numbers for average and worst case show the time increasing from ~4 miliseconds to ~8 as the query increases size from 8 characters to 4000+ over these texts. In the best case it matches or exceeds all other algorithms I've tested it against.
ripgrep
-
Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
ripgrep - https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
-
Code Search Is Hard
Basic code searching skills seems like something new developers are never explicitly taught, but which is an absolutely crucial skill to build early on.
I guess the knowledge progression I would recommend would look something kind this:
- Learning about Ctrl+F, which works basically everywhere.
- Transitioning to ripgrep https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep - I wouldn't even call this optional, it's truly an incredible and very discoverable tool. Requires keeping a terminal open, but that's a good thing for a newbie!
- Optional, but highly recommended: Learning one of the powerhouse command line editors. Teenage me recommended Emacs; current me recommends vanilla vim, purely because some flavor of it is installed almost everywhere. This is so that you can grep around and edit in the same window.
- In the same vein, moving back from ripgrep and learning about good old fashioned grep, with a few flags rg uses by default: `grep -r` for recursive search, `grep -ri` for case insensitive recursive search, and `grep -ril` for case insensitive recursive "just show me which files this string is found in" search. Some others too, season to taste.
- Finally hitting the wall with what ripgrep can do for you and switching to an actual indexed, dedicated code search tool.
-
Level Up Your Dev Workflow: Conquer Web Development with a Blazing Fast Neovim Setup (Part 1)
live grep: ripgrep
- Ripgrep
-
Modern Java/JVM Build Practices
The world has moved on though to opinionated tools, and Rust isn't even the furthest in that direction (That would be Go). The equivalent of those two lines in Cargo.toml would be this example of a basic configuration from the jacoco-maven-plugin: https://www.jacoco.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/examples/build/pom.x... - That's 40 lines in the section to do the "defaults".
Yes, you could add a load of config for files to include/exclude from coverage and so on, but the idea that that's a norm is way more common in Java projects than other languages. Like here's some example Cargo.toml files from complicated Rust projects:
Servo: https://github.com/servo/servo/blob/main/Cargo.toml
rust-gdext: https://github.com/godot-rust/gdext/blob/master/godot-core/C...
ripgrep: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/blob/master/Cargo.toml
socketio: https://github.com/1c3t3a/rust-socketio/blob/main/socketio/C...
-
Ugrep – a more powerful, ultra fast, user-friendly, compatible grep
I'm not clear on why you're seeing the results you are. It could be because your haystack is so small that you're mostly just measuring noise. ripgrep 14 did introduce some optimizations in workloads like this by reducing match overhead, but I don't think it's anything huge in this case. (And I just tried ripgrep 13 on the same commands above and the timings are similar if a tiny bit slower.)
[1]: https://github.com/radare/ired
[2]: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/discussions/2597
- Tell HN: My Favorite Tools
-
Potencializando Sua Experiência no Linux: Conheça as Ferramentas em Rust para um Desenvolvimento Eficiente
Explore o Ripgrep no repositório oficial: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
-
Scrybble is the ReMarkable highlights to Obsidian exporter I have been looking for
🔎🗃️ ripgrep or ugrep (search fast, use regex patterns or fuzzy search, pipe output to bash/zsh shell for further processing V coloring)
- RFC: Add ngram indexing support to ripgrep (2020)