smart-jump VS better-jumper

For me ff-other-file opens correctly for botch c and c++, and I don't even have any special setup, but it works only if both are in same folder. If you have sources separated typically in include and src I think you should go for lsp and xref, but I don't know, maybe there is some other well working setup too. You can also try smart-jump if you for some reason don't want to use lsp and xref.

[2] https://github.com/jojojames/smart-jump

I use smart-jump with LSP and it works quite well.

I use Doom which packages better-jumper and binds `better-jumper-jump-backward` to `C-o`. I use this binding extensively in my workflow and it mostly works well, but there are a few scenarios where jumping backwards doesn't seem to work.

I am trying to combine the package better-jumper into consult so I can browse my jump points with consults nice preview and search functionality. I have tried to use the existing consult commands as a template and have come up with the following code:

Please check out better-jumper.

Opened this issue on the the better-jumper repo but no response from the maintainer https://github.com/gilbertw1/better-jumper/issues/13

Finally zeroed in on the cause. cl-defstruct isn't available when better-jumper is byte-compiled. This wasn't the case before because Doom preloads cl-lib before packages are installed, but recently, straight (our package manager) began byte-compiling packages in a child process where cl-lib isn't preloaded. When a macro isn't available at compile time, it is treated as a function. cl-defstruct is a macro. When treated as a function, its first argument, better-jumper-jump-list-struct is treated as a variable reference -- a reference to a variable that doesn't exist.

Check out better-jumper, maybe it suits your needs.