simple-torrent VS arch-delugevpn

Looks really beautiful. I had a question how does it compare to Simple Torrent and why you chose Void instead of Alpine. PS. Indian and Arch user here :)

Instead of cloud-torrent, use simple-torrent instead. A fork, and actively developed.

I want to run simple-torrent as an additional client. So I think SSH is required, althought I am not sure how providers allocate ports for users.

Basically, I would like that few of my containers to use a proxy whenever they need to access the external world (e.g. Sonarr and its friends). At the moment, for Deluge I am using binhex docker image, an all in one solution for torrent, vpn and so on. Just to add an extra security layer, I would like to obfuscate from my ISP all the calls that the *Arr friends are doing to the usual search engines.

Solution in the end was to just find a pre-created docker image that handled both I used https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn but there seem to be qbittorrent equivalents out there.

Check it out, read the full page and have another go: https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

https://github.com/binhex/arch-qbittorrentvpn https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

Vpn killswitch Torrent clients: rutorrent deluge qbittorrent

Are you wanting to use your VPN for anything other than your torrent traffic? If not, an easier method might just be to grab an container that has VPN+torrent client in one. Like this: https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

Is arch-delugevpn still a popular route to go? Would like to use deluge or qbittorrent if possible.

DSM 7.1.1-42962 Update 3 was auto-installed on my DS220+ last night and today I can't access the web UI for binhex arch-delugevpn.

Seeing how the latest docker image arch-delugevpn doesn't work in DSM 7 (Kernel Too Old Message), what is the last known working version of Arch-Delugevpn that does work in DSM 7?