simple-ssg1 VS starter-workflows

Today, I also reviewed and added a few tests to another project, which was a similar tool of my friend. I was a little happy when I realized that I have structured my work in an easy way for testing such as I have lots of isolated small functions. Meanwhile, my friend had to copy his main function and rewrite it to be able to test its logic. It was a little confusing at first to figure out how everything works and to find something testable, but because he was also using Node.js and Jest, it was manageable.

To set up workflow I added nodeJS.yml file that runs on any push or PR to main branch.

For my SSG tool I used Jest, because it was made for JavaScript language(language my tool is using) and pretty straightforward to use.

This week I've been setting up code formatters for my project.

I was adding a configuration option via -c or –config option, where it will accept a JSON file as config file to use the values inside instead of other options. It waseasy to plan for what and how I want to do, since it’s just about reading a file and using the variables. The hard part was figuring out how my code would be compatible with the repo I tried to add it to. I was working on this repo, and I opened an issue and filed a pull request. This static site generator tool doesn’t use any options but accept arguments directly, so I had to use minimist package to parse options. There are a few variables that aren’t listed in the config module, such as stylesheet url, so I added them and use the variables from the config module instead. I also ended up slightly rewriting the language option code so the program would actually use the code from the author. Overall, there where bits and pieces of code for other options that aren’t entirely functional as options, so I ended up rewriting them a bit for the configuration option to work.

Today I have been adding some features to the tool:

I created SSG tool that allows you to conver txt files into html. I was unable to fix some issues yet, but planning to make it better in the future. (https://github.com/mnosov622/simple-ssg1).

I have an issue with the location of the script. When person clones the project, and then runs it, the tool gives weird error, saying that he can't find the location of the specified txt file. ( https://github.com/mnosov622/simple-ssg1/issues/2 )

GitHub, as one of the leading web-based Git repository hosting service, provides a powerful suite of CI/CD tools in the form of GitHub Actions. These are directly integrated into the platform which empowers developers to increase the speed, efficiency and reliability of delivering products. In this brief article, we will take a look at what CI/CD is, why we should use it, as well as some of its applications in my projects.

GitHub Actions is a modern CI/CD tool integrated natively on GitHub. Itenables the rapid automation of build, test, deployment, and other custom workflows on GitHub with no need for external tools.

GitHub Actions is GitHub's CI/CD solution. You can use it to run automated tasks each time you change your code. Although the platform lacks a built-in Kubernetes integration, third-party plugins such as Azure's Deploy to Kubernetes Cluster action can automate deployments and manage different rollout strategies.

GitHub Actions is a feature-rich CI/CD platform embedded within GitHub, enabling developers to automate, customize, and execute software development workflows directly in their repositories. An Action inside GitHub Actions is a discrete unit of automation that performs a specific task within a workflow. All the Actions are reusable, and there are many to choose from. You can even create your own reusable ones.

actions/starter-workflows

The real power of using PHP code-quality tools is when it’s added to your continuous integration process, which means it automatically checks the code every time someone makes a push or pull request to your project repo. In this section, we'll be looking at how to do just that. GitHub actions is available for free so we'll use it for demo purposes. Note that there are some limits to private repos, so set your test repo to public if you can.

You can even automate the running of this script — hence the directory name automation — to happen every time the data changes, using GitHub Actions.

# Based on https://github.com/actions/starter-workflows/blob/main/ci/node.js.yml name: CI on: pull_request: branches: - main jobs: ci: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v2 - uses: actions/setup-node@v2 with: node-version: lts/* cache: 'npm' - run: npm ci - run: npm run build --if-present - run: npm test

You might remember that I’ve been taking an interest in GitHub Actions for the last year or so (I even wrote a book on the subject). And at the Perl Conference in Toronto last summer I gave a talk called “GitHub Actions for Perl Development” (here are the slides and the video).