signer VS publications

Purchased my cspr.live transactions report, ive only been staking casper for about 3-6 months, I have over 2000 transactions just from casper rewards,

I'm having all kinds of issues. I have two different ledger devices, one Nano X and one S Plus that are associated to two different public key addresses on cspr.live. I've been using them just fine for months, when all of a sudden, when I connect my ledger like normal to cspr.live it wont pull up or recognize my public key address, it only shows new ones.

Thanks for your reply. So my ability to transfer funds relies on cspr.live? If this website is down I can't transfer funds?

Yes you can withdraw immediately from Kucoin, I just send mine over to cspr.live and get it staking asap

Good Evening fellow holder. Sometimes this can take a few min so should be done by now and crypto.com should send emails to say its complete. CSPR.Live is where they will be stored and The ledger is only used as your keys to approve any transactions on cspr.live. Always do a test transaction of the minimum CSPR first before sending remaining balance on your first time sending any. Did you send them to your cspr.live address ?

Yes that is how I am using it; utilizing just the seed phrase/private key to logon to cspr.live. I am aware that Ledger do not support it at moment. This is just to avoid using private keys manually by otherwise saving .pem files etc if ledger is not used.

yes but only via cspr.live website

I've been holding cspr on uphold for months and months and just now (ikik im late) decided to move them to my ledger. My understanding is that there is no longer a need for the casper signer to stake. Correct? I can just connect to cspr.live and delegate. Am i right?

I'm in a bit of a predicament after setting up an account on cspr.live linking it to my ledger nano x. All went well on set up, I sent a test amount over, then sent it back to an exchange to make sure it was all good to go, with zero issues.

Disagree, their reputation is tied to their audit quality.

But I'm pretty sure in this case the scope was bad. Like they coukd have had audits on "Do I use OpenSSL well?" and then misrepresent that all their privacy claims were audited.

Now it seems like Skiff conveniently didn't allow Trail of Bits to publish their reports, they are usually here: https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/tree/master/revi...

Disclaimer, I have used Trail of Bits service in the past (and 2 other auditors for an security campaign on a blockchain, cryptography + networking product).

Link to the report: https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/revi...

They seem to not have analysed client-side of PIP itself, but I suppose there isn't anything you could say that isn't already obvious to everyone.

Audits are mentioned on the Trail of Bits website https://github.com/trailofbits/publications and the Skiff one https://skiff.com/transparency. Skiff has been externally audited 4 times.

Here's the URL https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/SimpleXChat.pdf It was in the article I have already linked.

MYSO Finance Security Assesment by Trail of Bits

Trail of Bits

Hi! I'm Skiff's CEO. We've had 3 security audits, including 2 from Trail of Bits - one of the best security auditing firms in the world https://github.com/trailofbits/publications. Skiff Mail is also open-source: https://github.com/skiff-org/skiff-mail as is our whitepaper https://skiff.com/whitepaper We've also been in the news quite a bit: https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/17/23075804/skiff-mail-email-privacy, https://www.wsj.com/articles/encryption-bans-what-is-this-russia-hacking-online-privacy-security-data-signal-whatsapp-emails-protection-11675436242 (I wrote this with our team!), https://techcrunch.com/2023/01/30/russia-skiff-block/, and more, even though we're only a year old. We collect no personally identifying information - not even IP addresses used - no backup emails, phones, etc. - no advertising, and we end-to-end encrypt BOTH email subject + body and don't have any metadata (time sent/received an exception). What can we do to share more of this with more people? We're a younger company but it's so important this is made public.

Hi! I'm Skiff's CEO. We've had 3 security audits, including 2 from Trail of Bits - likely the best security auditing firm in the world https://github.com/trailofbits/publications. Skiff Mail is also open-source: https://github.com/skiff-org/skiff-mail as is our whitepaper https://skiff.com/whitepaper