shrc VS exa

do I need to say it: 4x time faster. just minus some the cool parts and fallbacks are not that hard, like local keyword https://github.com/denisde4ev/shrc/blob/master/_fallback/local. and the consequences of not having local all around my repos unset-unseted-i and unset-seted-i that throws error if nested functions use i variable at the same time.

I already have lolwall in my bashrc, but I forgot the bricks

my aliases are alias cin='xclip -sel clip -r' cout='xclip -sel clip -o' for clipboard input/output (hi C++ programmers). And if its Wayland then it uses wl-copy or if have termux-clipboard commands. my entire file for detecting it is: https://github.com/denisde4ev/shrc/blob/master/clip-io

I wrote my own sh function aliased to cd.. and CD https://github.com/denisde4ev/shrc/blob/master/_loadable/_cd__.sh

you can see my __load_loadable function here https://github.com/denisde4ev/shrc/blob/master/_loadable/LOADABLE (sorry if my code is not simple)

My PC: Lenovo AIO; 21" touchscreen monitor; Arch+KDE. I'm happy witch my bashrc/shrc organization

It depends on the scale of the project but man, if you can't build a simple CRUD app in your preferred stack and deploy it in some fashion (even if it's just a binary posted on some website, kinda like Exa) then that's just disappointing...

Can compile to a single binary to build tools like exa

Try https://github.com/ogham/exa and exa -T -L2 command . It will generate a good folder structure tree to update the question

Some of us don't want all of GNU's utilities; just on an as-needed basis. They're not as needed as they once were.

Many of these utilities have been rewritten in Rust and have more modern features.

For example, instead of ls, I use exa [1]. Or ripgrep [2] instead of grep.

[1]: https://github.com/ogham/exa

[2]: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep

fish: A very fast shell with various customization options to streamline daily commands. I discovered it through this post by @caarlos0, where he provides more details about performance and the differences between fish and zsh. Additionally, I use some CLI utilities like delta, exa, and ripgrep. Here's my dotfiles for fish.

Hi! I use this: https://the.exa.website, and the package to this: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/exa/

I still use exa for listing files in the terminal. It's a modern replacement for ls with a lot of useful features. With icons, colors, and git integration, it makes listing files much nicer.