shellcheck-repl
sh
shellcheck-repl | sh | |
---|---|---|
4 | 21 | |
15 | 6,859 | |
- | - | |
3.5 | 7.6 | |
29 days ago | 26 days ago | |
Shell | Go | |
ISC License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shellcheck-repl
-
Shell Script Best Practices, from a decade of scripting things
> "Use shellcheck."
(Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)
After falling in love with ShellCheck several years ago, with the help of another person, I made the ShellCheck REPL tool for Bash:
https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl>
-
Bash Pitfalls
Thank you, and thanks for the suggestion. Yes, it should be possible to keep the SC2154 check. I probably just disabled it as a quick fix when first started out. I'm tracking this in https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl/issues/15.
> You'd also want to take into account special variables like $RANDOM and $HOSTNAME, but that's pretty trivial.
It seems like ShellCheck is already aware of these special Bash variable, e.g. 'echo $RANDOM' will not trigger SC2154 (or even SC2086 that otherwise asks you to quote variables).
-
ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
shellcheck-repl: Validation of Shell Commands Before Evaluation
https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl
This tool validates your commands at the Bash prompt using ShellCheck and refuses to evaluate them if there's a mistake. It ignores a set of rules that doesn't play well with oneliners.
(Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)
sh
-
Show HN: Hucksh – A Shell with a Good Memory
* The shell itself is https://github.com/mvdan/sh, a bash-like command interpreter
-
Pure Bash Bible
https://github.com/mvdan/sh
And finally, checkbashisms if you intend on making pure posix scripts that are compatible with debian/ubuntu's dash. It is part of the debian's devscripts suite, but is often individually packaged in other distros.
> Also you can use the chat as a learning tool
Or you could learn from a guide written by people who have suffered decades of experience of the pitfalls of shell scripting and have shared their woes.
https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide
- Shfmt – format shell programs
- Shfmt – format shell programs (like gofmt, rustfmt)
-
Gofumpt: It's like gofmt except more strict
My bad, I completely screwed this up... the as of yet undiscussed project is:
https://github.com/mvdan/sh
(not shmfmt)
-
Gosh Linux shell written in Golang
I support projects like this for purposes of exploration and practice. But don't expect people to use it when there are already well established projects out there like: https://github.com/mvdan/sh
- mvdan/sh: A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter with bash support; includes shfmt
-
similar to shellcheck?
There are also: - shfmt - sh - bash language server - bashate
- shfmt - formatting comments issue
-
Indenting piped shell expressions in a script?
I also like running shfmt over my shell scripts so they all look the same without me having to think about whitespace.
What are some alternatives?
shellharden - The corrective bash syntax highlighter
bat - A cat(1) clone with wings.
bats-core - Bash Automated Testing System
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
pure-bash-bible - 📖 A collection of pure bash alternatives to external processes.
go-pkg-xmlx
go-pkg-rss
isort - A Python utility / library to sort imports.
inject
dmenu-scripts - Serious fun with dmenu
toml - TOML parser for Golang with reflection.