shellcheck-repl
find-sec-bugs
| shellcheck-repl | find-sec-bugs | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2,209 | |
| - | 0.7% | |
| 3.5 | 5.7 | |
| 28 days ago | 23 days ago | |
| Shell | Java | |
| ISC License | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shellcheck-repl
-
Shell Script Best Practices, from a decade of scripting things
> "Use shellcheck."
(Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)
After falling in love with ShellCheck several years ago, with the help of another person, I made the ShellCheck REPL tool for Bash:
https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl> -
Bash Pitfalls
Thank you, and thanks for the suggestion. Yes, it should be possible to keep the SC2154 check. I probably just disabled it as a quick fix when first started out. I'm tracking this in https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl/issues/15.
> You'd also want to take into account special variables like $RANDOM and $HOSTNAME, but that's pretty trivial.
It seems like ShellCheck is already aware of these special Bash variable, e.g. 'echo $RANDOM' will not trigger SC2154 (or even SC2086 that otherwise asks you to quote variables).
-
ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
shellcheck-repl: Validation of Shell Commands Before Evaluation
https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/shellcheck-repl
This tool validates your commands at the Bash prompt using ShellCheck and refuses to evaluate them if there's a mistake. It ignores a set of rules that doesn't play well with oneliners.
(Disclaimer: I'm one of the authors)
find-sec-bugs
- Find Security Bugs
-
What are some useful static analyzers for Java?
SpotBugs have a lot of extensions such as https://find-sec-bugs.github.io/ https://github.com/KengoTODA/findbugs-slf4j and more, I recommend adding them as well
-
Looking for a Static Code Analysis tool for Scala Code
If you don’t have checkmarx/Vera code money, have you looked at https://find-sec-bugs.github.io/? It can be used with a few things such as https://spotbugs.github.io/ and sonarQ
-
Enforcing Coding Best Practices using CI
SpotBugs with Find sec bugs for Java
-
Conducting SAST for Java Applications
How can the article fail to mention Find Security Bugs (find-sec-bugs) when talking about using SpotBugs (ex-FindBugs) for analyzing code for security issues?
-
Design an Effective Build Stage for Continuous Integration
Find Security Bugs uses a security database to detect almost 140 different vulnerability types in Java web applications.
-
ShellCheck: A static analysis tool for shell scripts
find-sec-bugs does that. It's used by, for example, SonarQube.
See hhttps://github.com/find-sec-bugs/find-sec-bugs/blob/master/f... and do a "CTRL-F" and search for "References".
What are some alternatives?
shellharden - The corrective bash syntax highlighter
Spotbugs - SpotBugs is FindBugs' successor. A tool for static analysis to look for bugs in Java code.
bats-core - Bash Automated Testing System
semgrep-rules - Semgrep rules registry
pure-bash-bible - 📖 A collection of pure bash alternatives to external processes.
snyk - Snyk CLI scans and monitors your projects for security vulnerabilities. [Moved to: https://github.com/snyk/cli]
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
semgrep - Lightweight static analysis for many languages. Find bug variants with patterns that look like source code.
isort - A Python utility / library to sort imports.
static-analysis - ⚙️ A curated list of static analysis (SAST) tools and linters for all programming languages, config files, build tools, and more. The focus is on tools which improve code quality.
dmenu-scripts - Serious fun with dmenu
infer - A static analyzer for Java, C, C++, and Objective-C