sharpfuzz VS LibAFL

Compare sharpfuzz vs LibAFL and see what are their differences.

LibAFL

Advanced Fuzzing Library - Slot your Fuzzer together in Rust! Scales across cores and machines. For Windows, Android, MacOS, Linux, no_std, ... (by AFLplusplus)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
sharpfuzz LibAFL
1 4
351 1,842
- 1.6%
6.5 9.8
2 months ago 5 days ago
C# Rust
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

sharpfuzz

Posts with mentions or reviews of sharpfuzz. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-16.
  • When do you consider your unit tests be "enough"?
    4 projects | /r/dotnet | 16 Jun 2021
    Because of the above I've generally been using tools like Stryker.NET and FsCheck to augment my testing suite. I'm still doing unit testing to find the more obvious "I haven't had my coffee, let's make sure I'm doing what I think I'm doing" bugs. I'm just using things like mutation testing, property testing, fuzzing, etc. to find the deeper issues in my code. There's a ton of libraries out there, including one that I've built for myself to help with testing but FsCheck and Stryker are just beautiful. And if you're interested in fuzzing, SharpFuzz is a great option. But that one isn't quite as easy of an on ramp compared to the other two that I mentioned.

LibAFL

Posts with mentions or reviews of LibAFL. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-20.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sharpfuzz and LibAFL you can also consider the following projects:

Stryker.NET - Mutation testing for .NET core and .NET framework!

AFLplusplus - The fuzzer afl++ is afl with community patches, qemu 5.1 upgrade, collision-free coverage, enhanced laf-intel & redqueen, AFLfast++ power schedules, MOpt mutators, unicorn_mode, and a lot more!

FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET

frida-fuzzer - This experimetal fuzzer is meant to be used for API in-memory fuzzing.

cargo-fuzz - Command line helpers for fuzzing

libfuzzer - Rust bindings and utilities for LLVM’s libFuzzer

e9afl - AFL binary instrumentation

wtf - wtf is a distributed, code-coverage guided, customizable, cross-platform snapshot-based fuzzer designed for attacking user and / or kernel-mode targets running on Microsoft Windows and Linux user-mode (experimental!).

afl.rs - 🐇 Fuzzing Rust code with American Fuzzy Lop

Fuzzing101 - An step by step fuzzing tutorial. A GitHub Security Lab initiative

StdFuzzer - StdFuzzer is the reference implementation of a generic bit-level fuzzer with LibAFL