shared-modules VS ImageMagick

You can probably use the shared-modules file for Python 2.7 as a starting point, assuming they didn't change their build process too significantly between 2.7 and 3.8.

If it's not guaranteed to be provided by the runtime (which I imagine freetype2 would be), then it's a bug and should be reported. (I submitted a fix for sdl12-compat.json not listing its dependency on GLU.)

Not sure about it, but the gimp flatpak builds gtk2 so I'm not sure if it's part of any runtime or not: https://github.com/flathub/shared-modules/blob/4c83a37cf50fa4c03ceffaf075a189031b5e8e94/gtk2/gtk2.json

There are some cases where libraries are not shared: Old libraries for example like Python 2 must be bundled with the application, so they can differ. Even then, most stock 'legacy' libraries share the same shared-modules.

Flathub has a shared module for libusb: https://github.com/flathub/shared-modules/blob/master/libusb/libusb.json

To tie all this together, we made an org profile for our GitHub organization page. There are some great examples of these, like Microsoft and PayPal. For Fastly's, we wanted something friendly and human so we used Imagemagick to create a montage of all the avatars of the Fastly team members who have contributed to the open source projects in our org:

Python has become a popular programming language for different applications, including data science, artificial intelligence, and web development. But, did you know creating and rendering fully customized videos with Python is also possible? At Stack Builders, we have successfully used Python libraries such as MoviePy, SciPy, and ImageMagick to generate videos with animations, text, and images. In this article, we will look closer at how Python can be used for video generation and explore some of the powerful libraries and tools that make it possible.

ImageMagick is the main tool and can do most conversions and image operations. For example to resize a whole folder of photos and convert to WebP you can do this:

Lack of open governance explains the fork in 2002. [0] The github commit history shows it's still a largely one-person-band. [1] The problems with this include a lack of succession planning, a lack of ability to scale bandwidth, and a narrower pool of ideas. The documentation website is really out-of-date as it mentions using a Borland compiler.

Alternatives to IM:

- https://www.libvips.org

- http://www.graphicsmagick.org (IM fork)

0. https://marc.info/?l=imagemagick-developer&m=104777007831767...

1. https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick

You can rotate it using https://imagemagick.org