setup_tag VS proper

Compare setup_tag vs proper and see what are their differences.

setup_tag

Use tags to mix and match your exunit test context (by vic)
Testing
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

proper

PropEr: a QuickCheck-inspired property-based testing tool for Erlang (by proper-testing)
Testing Erlang release-badge codecov-badge erlang-versions-badge
Source Code
proper-testing.github.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
setup_tag proper
- 3
2 878
- 0.1%
0.0 3.1
almost 8 years ago 10 months ago
Elixir Erlang
Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

setup_tag

Posts with mentions or reviews of setup_tag. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning setup_tag yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

proper

Posts with mentions or reviews of proper. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-03.
  • How programmers make sure that their software is correct
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jan 2022
    > There are generally two main categories of tests. There are unit tests [and] Integration tests

    Later on there is a mention of fuzzing. However, there is something better called property tests. Where the on failure there is automatic "shrinking" of input complexity to find a minimally failing test scenario.

    For Erlang and Elixir I recommend https://propertesting.com/ book and the PropEr test framework https://github.com/proper-testing/proper.

    As an example, here is the use of an advanced feature called targeted property based testing: https://proper-testing.github.io/tutorials/PropEr_testing_wi... used to test a labyrinth.

  • Laura Castro on Property-Based Testing in Elixir
    5 projects | dev.to | 3 Sep 2021
    [1] https://proper-testing.github.io/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing setup_tag and proper you can also consider the following projects:

blacksmith - Data generation framework for Elixir

StreamData - Data generation and property-based testing for Elixir. 🔮

excheck - Property-based testing library for Elixir (QuickCheck style).

espec - Elixir Behaviour Driven Development

hound - Elixir library for writing integration tests and browser automation

meck - A mocking library for Erlang

faker - Faker is a pure Elixir library for generating fake data.

Quixir - Property-based testing for Elixir

espec_phoenix - ESpec for Phoenix web framework.

mix_test_watch - 🎠 Because TDD is awesome

katt - KATT (Klarna API Testing Tool) is an HTTP-based API testing tool for Erlang.

setup_tag vs blacksmith proper vs StreamData setup_tag vs excheck proper vs espec setup_tag vs hound proper vs meck setup_tag vs faker proper vs Quixir setup_tag vs meck proper vs espec_phoenix setup_tag vs mix_test_watch proper vs katt