profile VS Hugo

So, have your GitHub registration properly filled out. That way you don't need to make any code changes. 🤖

GitHub has tucked the personal access tokens admin in a slightly hard-to-find location. From anywhere in GitHub, you can click on your profile image → Settings → Developer Settings → Personal Access Tokens.

That account has the "Make profile private and hide activity" option turned on in https://github.com/settings/profile which hides your contributions, activity, followers, followings, stars, etc.

Abra o GitHub, e vá para Settings,

Go to your settings at https://github.com/settings/profile and check "Include private contributions on my profile"

By opting to allow developers to use their own accounts to sign in, with or without SAML SSO, developers are able to stay in control of their own GitHub identity. They also don’t have to manage a separate “work” GitHub account and can keep data such as commit statistics all in one place. To see it in action, go to https://github.com/settings/profile and enable the checkbox as seen in the screenshot below:

So, have your GitHub registration properly filled out. That way you don't need to make any code changes. 🤖

I just get 500 on the homepage, and my profile also 500s when logged out. Most other things still seem to work, including https://github.com/settings/profile where I could turn it off.

To create the GitHub Client ID and Client Secret, go to https://github.com/settings/profile, Developer Settings on the left-hand nav-bar, OAuth Apps, New OAuth App. Fill in a name and your localhost with port for the homepage URL. Copy the homepage URL and add /api/auth/callback/github. This will allow the /api/auth/[...nextauth].ts file to catch this callback URL and use it to create a user in the database. The form should look something like this:

This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts.

Hugo

Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms.

As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g. https://gohugo.io/hosting-and-deployment/hosting-on-github/), your normal workflow will simply be to edit markdown and do a git push to make your changes live. There are a number of pre-built themes (e.g. https://themes.gohugo.io/) you can use, and these are realtively straightforward to tweak to your requirements.

Create the technical documentation of your project You can use any of the following options: * A wiki, like the ArchWiki that uses MediaWiki * Read the Docs, used by projects like Setuptools. Check Awesome Read the Docs for more examples. * Create a website * Create a blog, like the documentation of Blowfish, a theme for Hugo.

Doing this made me appreciate existing SSGs like Hugo and Next.js even more👏👏

I suggest hugo: https://gohugo.io/

Generates a completely static website from MD (and other formats) files; also handles themes (including a lot of them rendering well on mobile), and different types of content - posts, articles, etc. - depending on the theme.

It's open source and, being completely static, cheap as fuck to self host.

I would suggest looking into static site generators. Some popular examples, which are used myself are: - Hugo: https://gohugo.io/ - Jekyll: https://jekyllrb.com